Talk:Mission Dolores Park

California: San Francisco Bay Area Start‑class

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Archives

no archives yet (create)

Oct. 27 2009: Why does it say the park is "two blocks tall by one block wide"? It's 4 blocks wide by one block tall, if you were standing at the "entrance on Dolores st. and 19th looking toward Church st. Look at the map. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.173.107 (talk) 04:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you're standing on 19th St, one "block" in either direction would take you to 18th or 20th Sts, not Hancock or Cumberland. It makes more sense to define this area's city blocks in the north-south direction by the numbered streets, since named streets like Hancock, Cumberland, and Hill start and end inconsistently. --209.2.219.250 (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dolorespark.jpg

This photo is really unrepresentative of the park. First, it's a photo of 10% of the park, and not even from the top where the panoramic view can be found. Second, most of the photo is of a dry field. I suggest removing this photo and replacing it. I'll try to do this asap. —Viriditas | Talk 10:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced lead image with Image:Dolores park.jpg. This is still only about 50% of the park. I did find panoramic views of the entire park on flickr that were appropriately licensed, but they were of poor quality. —Viriditas | Talk 11:19, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]