Am not. → ROUX₪ 18:01, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You are merely a bizarre figment of our imaginations? Perhaps a compromised account, we should block it ;-P (talk→BWilkins←track) 09:37, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't been paying attention. I don't compromise. Congrats on the mop, btw. About fucking time the community grew a brain cell and gave it to you. → ROUX₪ 15:55, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, nice of you to disappear after suggesting I run again ... I may have needed your !vote, and where would I be then? LOL (talk→BWilkins←track) 17:07, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I saw you post on ANI and thought it was an impersonator, but you're really back? Welcome back! :) -- Atama頭 16:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You must be imagining things. → ROUX₪ 17:00, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
← You won't leave again, will you? :P fetchcomms☛ 01:49, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcom back, to the land of Wikia. GoodDay (talk) 16:34, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Edit on VP
I've had this happen to me before. If you want, request a CheckUser. If you want any insurance, I won't run for adminship. I was planning to do so when I graduated from college (9 years in the future). I'll just sit around Wikipedia making good edits as a normal user.
I blocked you and Malleus. You're correct that Malleus "started it", but it takes two to tango. I've been seeing more and more of your arguments on multiple noticeboards, and it's not alright to treat Wikipedia like your last battlefield. If he starts something, don't engage and stay on topic; don't encourage him, that's the best you can do. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 17:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh please. My sole argument with him was on the content board--where, if you'd note, I agreed with what he was saying, just not the manner in which he was saying it. He is the one who is being abusive towards others, including me, ``he`` is the one who is taking opportunities to make this a battleground, not me. More to the point, I was responding to you. Saying "Oh that's just how Malleus is"? That's bullshit and you know it. He is causing the problem, and yet I'm punitively blocked? You have really got a strange sense of humour. I simply will not stand for people making allegations about me--and that is something Wikipedia needs more of, not less. Other people come by and read things, they never look into the history, and allowing bullshit such as Malleus commonly spouts to stand means that he gets to dictate reality. → ROUX₪ 17:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
You have got to be joking. He shows up to attack me, I respond, and I get blocked? That is crap and you know it. I had said nothing to or about him, he decided to start harassing me, I was responding to Fuchs' comment.
Decline reason:
Somebody else starting it does not excuse you from incivility and personal attacks such as this. An equal response to such back and forth is appropriate. Chillum(Need help? Ask me) 18:07, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Truth is not always polite. Malleus does act like a dick, and I'm not going to mince words. Nor am I going to pretend it's okay to sit idly by when I'm being attacked out of nowhere. Christ, what the hell is wrong with you people? Perfectly okay for Malleus to randomly show up and start attacking me, not okay for me to be pissed off about it. Gah. → ROUX₪ 18:10, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Our response to personal attacks has been the same for years now, you should know it by now and not be surprised. You are welcome to respond to attacks but not with attacks of your own. Malleus is blocked too so I don't know why you think we are finding his behavior "perfectly okay". Don't use this talk page for further insults or you will have your editing privileges disabled for the duration of the block. Chillum(Need help? Ask me) 18:12, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously. The blame the victim bullshit here has to stop. Or have you not noticed that saying anything about Malleus in any way is met with heaps of abuse and bullshit? It doesn't matter how one says it; once you're on his "I will shit on you at every opportunity" list, you're fucked. Check this out for an example of what I mean. Malleus simply cannot resist taking any opportunity to belittle people. And yet when we respond or make the mistake of telling the fucking truth, we get punished (and seriously, don't bother giving me any claptrap bullshit about blocks being preventive; they're punitive and you know it, otherwise unblocks would be swift and frequent). There's a giant fucking problem here, and blaming the victim instead of the instigator makes it worse and worse and worse. → ROUX₪ 18:22, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
