Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Cheban

Jonathan Cheban

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable publicist. A Google search shows little to no write up in reliable sources outside of social networking sites and celeb/gossip sites. Starting a (non-notable?) TV show and having notable clients is not sufficient since notability is not inherited. Astronaut (talk) 19:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The only independent source given is a short one paragraph announcement about Kim Kardashian which makes one passing mention of Cheban. No evidence at all of notability. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:23, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP A four page Washington Post article has been included that from 2005 that demonstrates notability. You will note the requirements for entertainer biography are as such, "Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment." SPINdustry certainly unique as it is the first reality show of such a public relations business. Cheban is a prolific celebrity as he is regularly a part of Keeping up with the Kardashians, and has gained notoriety in the Washington Post for his business. While many people don't believe Kim Kardashian or Paris Hilton deserve their fame and notability, one cannot deny they are famous and notable -- the same is true of Jonathan Cheban. This seems to be more a matter of personal taste, than a matter of whether this post is truly notable. jwolfe2

Significant changes have been made. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwolfe2 (talk • contribs) 23:11, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. I don't appreciate the way that Jonathan Cheban dumped me after he got his E! Show. I did everything for that man -- cook, clean, even massaged his feet. I truly loved him and he left me for another man. Over my dead body will this wikipedia entry be included. Hellbus (talk) 07:28, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MERGE with Kim Kardashian. badmachine (talk) 18:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]