Talk:Paul Bremer

Paul Bremer is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 15, 2003	Featured article candidate	Promoted
August 10, 2004	Featured article review	Demoted

Current status: Former featured article

Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as High-importance).

International relations Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.

Previous discussions:

Yale's Secret Society

It would be interesting indeed to find out if Bremer was ever eligible to be invited to join Yale's Skull and Bones as Bremer is described by one of his colleagues to be a voracious opportunist. Ronewirl (talk) 12:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality ?

I highly question the neutrality of this article. Perhaps the author(s) should consider a political debate forum. M.bestland (talk) 04:17, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This poorly written article has been in its present state for close to 4 years now. There were at least two attempts to neutralize the point of view - albeit, unsuccessfully and thwarted by excessive "reverts" and several blocks from editing. If you insist on pursuing this debate, you might want to contact user:geo swan to obtain his/her permission and consensus. If you don't, any change you make that could be construed as "pro-bremer" will be reverted by geo swan. Ronewirl (talk) 19:54, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

if citations are not provided I will revert those section - using my regular login.