User talk:Mogilev82

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Mogilev82, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Cirt (talk) 19:41, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revert war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Renata (talk) 19:46, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, they delete referenced information, intervent! Free Belarus (talk) 19:47, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Username blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Free Belarus, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 00:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z12

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Allowing username change to [[::User:Mogilev82|Mogilev82]] (talk · contribs). Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking.

Request handled by: Beeblebrox (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Please do also keep in mind that we strive to maintain a neutral point of view here, and editing that violates that principle can also get you into trouble. Just a word of caution since you obviously have strong feelings about Belarus. Also, the only exception to the policy on edit warring is reverting blatant vandalism. For everything else, puruse page protection or dispute resolution as needed. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Dude, I am being NPOV, all I say is referenced, I used the discussion page, the thing is those who revert me don't say anything, they just revert! One deletes references of categories of the person because he doesn't like it, another one doesn't see the difference between nationality and ethnicity and labels him as an ethnic Pole thought he isn't an ethnic Pole but a Pole by nationality, I am actualy being completely NPOV! Free Belarus (talk) 21:12, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't quite understand why my nicknamed was forced to be changed? Yes, this nick is an oposition to Lukashenka, but I saw alot of users here having their political ideologies written on their page, so I don't understand why Free Belarus was so wrong. Free Belarus (talk) 21:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for edit warring and using sock abusively

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusively using multiple accounts and IPs and edit warring. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Mogilev82 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1. The reference clearly states Kościuszko was Belarusian ethnicity, so there is no justification to delete the Belarus related categories. On the discussion page it was many time discussed that it's not right few Polish nationalists delete those stuff, yet they keep on doing it, and by ignoring it you give legitimacy to it. All I did was adding referenced information, with the categories that come along, yet some people just reverted it ignoring all discussion and pushing their POV, so I was blocked? They deleted references and categories fitting there!

2. About the Poles page. Kościuszko was not an ethnic Pole, while the article Poles is about the ethnic group Poles, so how can he stay in the collage? And one more thing! I started on the discussion page a discussion about it as you can see, could you force all sides to take part in it? It's not right people just revert without giving any rational to why they revert.

3. You blamed me for sock puppetry and even blocked me indefinitely, that is simply not true. I wasn't blocked till you blocked me, I was editing from the IP because I didn't feel like loging in, thats all. It's weird that I'm blocked, while user Marekchelsea who kept on ignoring the talk page when I asked him to enter there for discussion and who deleted references and delets categories is not blocked. Please unblocked me and force ALL sides to explaine themselves on the discussion page. Mogilev82 (talk) 20:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=1. The reference clearly states Kościuszko was Belarusian ethnicity, so there is no justification to delete the Belarus related categories. On the discussion page it was many time discussed that it's not right few Polish nationalists delete those stuff, yet they keep on doing it, and by ignoring it you give legitimacy to it. All I did was adding referenced information, with the categories that come along, yet some people just reverted it ignoring all discussion and pushing their POV, so I was blocked? They deleted references and categories fitting there! 

2. About the Poles page. Kościuszko was not an ethnic Pole, while the article Poles is about the ethnic group Poles, so how can he stay in the collage? And one more thing! I started on the discussion page a discussion about it as you can see, could you force all sides to take part in it? It's not right people just revert without giving any rational to why they revert.

3. You blamed me for sock puppetry and even blocked me indefinitely, that is simply not true. I wasn't blocked till you blocked me, I was editing from the IP because I didn't feel like loging in, thats all. It's weird that I'm blocked, while user Marekchelsea who kept on ignoring the talk page when I asked him to enter there for discussion and who deleted references and delets categories is not blocked. Please unblocked me and force ALL sides to explaine themselves on the discussion page. [[User:Mogilev82|Mogilev82]] ([[User talk:Mogilev82#top|talk]]) 20:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=1. The reference clearly states Kościuszko was Belarusian ethnicity, so there is no justification to delete the Belarus related categories. On the discussion page it was many time discussed that it's not right few Polish nationalists delete those stuff, yet they keep on doing it, and by ignoring it you give legitimacy to it. All I did was adding referenced information, with the categories that come along, yet some people just reverted it ignoring all discussion and pushing their POV, so I was blocked? They deleted references and categories fitting there! 

2. About the Poles page. Kościuszko was not an ethnic Pole, while the article Poles is about the ethnic group Poles, so how can he stay in the collage? And one more thing! I started on the discussion page a discussion about it as you can see, could you force all sides to take part in it? It's not right people just revert without giving any rational to why they revert.

3. You blamed me for sock puppetry and even blocked me indefinitely, that is simply not true. I wasn't blocked till you blocked me, I was editing from the IP because I didn't feel like loging in, thats all. It's weird that I'm blocked, while user Marekchelsea who kept on ignoring the talk page when I asked him to enter there for discussion and who deleted references and delets categories is not blocked. Please unblocked me and force ALL sides to explaine themselves on the discussion page. [[User:Mogilev82|Mogilev82]] ([[User talk:Mogilev82#top|talk]]) 20:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=1. The reference clearly states Kościuszko was Belarusian ethnicity, so there is no justification to delete the Belarus related categories. On the discussion page it was many time discussed that it's not right few Polish nationalists delete those stuff, yet they keep on doing it, and by ignoring it you give legitimacy to it. All I did was adding referenced information, with the categories that come along, yet some people just reverted it ignoring all discussion and pushing their POV, so I was blocked? They deleted references and categories fitting there! 

2. About the Poles page. Kościuszko was not an ethnic Pole, while the article Poles is about the ethnic group Poles, so how can he stay in the collage? And one more thing! I started on the discussion page a discussion about it as you can see, could you force all sides to take part in it? It's not right people just revert without giving any rational to why they revert.

3. You blamed me for sock puppetry and even blocked me indefinitely, that is simply not true. I wasn't blocked till you blocked me, I was editing from the IP because I didn't feel like loging in, thats all. It's weird that I'm blocked, while user Marekchelsea who kept on ignoring the talk page when I asked him to enter there for discussion and who deleted references and delets categories is not blocked. Please unblocked me and force ALL sides to explaine themselves on the discussion page. [[User:Mogilev82|Mogilev82]] ([[User talk:Mogilev82#top|talk]]) 20:41, 22 March 2010 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

The sock puppetry charge is a serious one -- people don't always react well when someone uses multiple identities in an argument, and some people view logging out as just that -- but I'm also concerned by your penchant for edit warring. If you were unblocked, would you agree to avoid reverting, and instead discuss your edits and develop consensus through dispute resolution? – Luna Santin (talk) 00:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but I was blocked one time due to my nickname, which I changed by the way (which is funny people didn't like my link and blamed me for nationalism, my nickname was just an opposition to Lukashenko, I didn't know opposing to him is nationalism), that's all! I didn't do any sockpuppeting. And it's funny I, who tried to start a discussion and used references am blocked, while Polish nationalists who revert without explanation whoever does what they don't like are not blocked. Just check the discussion pages of those pages, many people complaoned on that fact! I mean, that's stupid! The link clearly states he was of Belarusian ethnicity, what is their problem? Why not to add Belars related categories? And I am the one that's blocked after that! I didn't want to edit war, I was the first to complain on the admins board on this argument, I was the one who asked so an admin would protect the page, force the sides to enter the discussion page and then decide who'se right and what will or won't be entered. I reverted only because no admin responsed to my call! If the page will be protected, the sides will be forced to come to the discussion page and then you after seeing what both sides say will decide who'se right, sure during that time I won't revert, I don't want this revert war! Mogilev82 (talk) 19:33, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]