Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Germany/Assessment

c class

Do you accept the new C class rating? Gaia Octavia Agrippa^Talk | _Sign 23:24, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We recently started to do so, see the main project page at WT:GER. Kusma (talk) 15:37, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would Bundesautobahn 9 be a C-class? --G-41614 (talk) 09:44, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, BAB 9 is a start class article, due to the lack of references, and the short lead (it's only one sentence), but a C-class can be asigned by any user. Sebastian scha. (talk) 17:29, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

assessment of soccer

there is a fooball wikiproject germany task force, should wikiproject germany assessing(?) these articles also? I think one germany is enough and this assessment thingi is cruft allready. Greetings. Sebastian scha. (talk) 21:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I missed this. Yes I think it should be. Importance rating might very well differ although class should be the same. If it was a subproject of WP:GER it could be incorporated into the main template, but I believe it is a subproject of WP:FOOTBALL. Agathoclea (talk) 09:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Multitude of suddenly unassessed articles

Has something somewhere gone wrong within the last 24 hours? Last night there were no unassessed articles. All of a sudden there appear 674 unassessed articles on the work list, some of which already seem to have been assessed, others haven't but never showed on the list. --Ekki01 (talk) 16:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was a problem with {{WikiProject Germany}}, which I think Kusma (talk) has now fixed. Perhaps that was the problem.--Boson (talk) 20:29, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. --Ekki01 (talk) 08:34, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]