User talk:Caitifty

Welcome!

Hello, Caitifty, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Robotman ¹⁹⁷⁴ 19:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Greenland 19:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for experimenting with the page Greenland on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added obviously incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in our encyclopedia must be verifiable. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Robotman ¹⁹⁷⁴ 19:33, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Caitifty, thanks for dropping a note on my talk page. I was too hasty in reverting your edit - you'd be surprised how an ordinary article like Greenland can be a target for vandalism. It did seem very unlikely to me at first, but after checking the web link you showed me, I suggest you add the info again. You can simply include the link after the sentence in brackets [] like this [1]. If you want, you can look at WP:CITE#HOW to get an idea of how to use the page as a reference. Happy editing, and sorry about my bad judgment call. Robotman ¹⁹⁷⁴ 20:20, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Oh how I laughed when I read this. You got there in the end though ;). Ceoil (talk) 12:22, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, anytime : ) I'm sure there'll be more.. Caitifty (talk) 23:14, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NSP edits

Hi Caitifty,

Good job on the NSP edit. A lot of articles relating to Harm Minimisation have been heavily edited of late by an editor who seems to have a grudge against the idea. I've been trying to balance out their changes on other pages but haven't had the energy to plunge into the giant mess that is the NSP article. So I didn't see the wonderful comment that had been added stating that all research is wrong :)

I might have a go at it now, I've put a few comments on the talk page for other people to help out. I'll break it up into headings and shovel out any of the garbage. If you wanted to help polishing it, I'd really appreciate it.--rakkar (talk) 06:09, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caititfy, can I get your feedback here? Talk:Safe injection site#Naming

If you & others are happy, I'd like to change the name of safe injection sites to Safer injecting facilities. The idea of these facilities isn't to promote the idea that injecting is safe, but that the facilities are to make a risky behaviour safer.--rakkar (talk) 06:40, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]