User talk:66.158.68.102

Attention:

This IP address, 66.158.68.102, is registered to Winnetka (US). In the event of persistent vandalism from this address, efforts may be made to contact them to report abuse. Contact information may be available in the WHOIS report.

If you are editing from this IP address and are frustrated by irrelevant messages, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself. Sometimes, in response to vandalism, you may be temporarily unable to create an account.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for the owner of the IP to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time.

If you are the owner of this address responding to reports of inappropriate conduct from this address, you may find the contributions history and block log for this address helpful. Please feel free to contact any administrator who has blocked this address with questions (blocking admins will be listed in the block log).

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Thank you for experimenting with the page Swamp on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ ^{Walkie-talkie} 21:00, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Biome. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Matthuxtable 21:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Pythagoras, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 19:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. One or more of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Military of ancient Rome, have been considered unhelpful or unconstructive and have been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Húsönd 16:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC) [reply]

Your recent edit to Gladiator (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 16:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Gladiator. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. SmartGuy 16:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SmartGuy 16:14, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated.-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:26, 8 May 2007 (UTC) [reply]

May 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Gladiator. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jim Joyce, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:54, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jim Joyce, you will be blocked from editing. —DerHexer (Talk) 20:54, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Gladiator (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 13:12, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits to Warwick Castle
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Warwick Castle on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Keith D 15:20, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent edit to Holy Grail (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Holy Grail. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Arthana 13:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
January 2008
Your recent edit to Shoshenq II (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 17:12, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Shoshenq II constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. – Gurch 17:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)) [reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Valley of the Kings. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. – Gurch 17:15, 31 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Ramesses II. – Gurch 17:19, 31 January 2008 (UTC) [reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.
February 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Biodiversity has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 15:10, 8 February 2008 (UTC) [reply]

The recent edit you made to Biodiversity constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Waggers (talk) 15:11, 8 February 2008 (UTC)) [reply]

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Jury has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Epbr123 (talk) 16:27, 23 May 2008 (UTC) [reply]

January 2009
Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Singapore has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Gail (talk) 18:57, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 18:17, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
66.158.68.102 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

IP address is shared by over 500 people. No connection to OttomanJackson. (P.S. Get rid of the strikethrough for my Money (Michael Jackson song) AfD vote.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=IP address is shared by over 500 people. No connection to OttomanJackson. (P.S. Get rid of the strikethrough for my [[Money (Michael Jackson song)]] AfD vote. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=IP address is shared by over 500 people. No connection to OttomanJackson. (P.S. Get rid of the strikethrough for my [[Money (Michael Jackson song)]] AfD vote. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=IP address is shared by over 500 people. No connection to OttomanJackson. (P.S. Get rid of the strikethrough for my [[Money (Michael Jackson song)]] AfD vote. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.