Talk:William Moultrie

Template:WikiProject United States governors

Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

Military history: Biography / North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

Category removed

I removed the Continental Congressmen category. Moultrie was named by the SC assembly as a delegate twice. Both times he declined the nomination. I have added this to article to things I need to update, but there's a lot in front of it, so feel free to edit. ;-) Lou I 13:32, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Large addition of unsourced material removed

I'm reverting your edits. This is far too much unsourced material to add. Please read WP:RS and WP:Verify. Blogs and their like aren't generally considered reliable sources, and please be careful that you don't copy anything directly or even closely paraphrase it as that might be considered a copyright violation (we are conservative on copyright, if it isn't clearly public domain we assume it's copyright. Don't take this personally, it's just general advice everyone should get. Also, you aren't using edit summaries, another reason edits often get reverted. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. And finally, far too many capital letters, please read WP:MOSCAPS. Dougweller (talk) 12:53, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

'Please help improve this article by adding reliable references' I'd kindly ask you not to revert any edits . leave it for the wikipedia community to make small adjustments. I don't feel a revert is warranted. Please specify the aspects you object to . I'd rather discuss it here , before removing my edits .

Fdiamond (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fdiamond (talk • contribs) 13:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's the way it works. You are supposed to add references when you add the material, not expect other editors to do your work. I'm part of the community you mention and I've specified my objections. Dougweller (talk) 13:06, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i'm afraid that i dont like your tone . as i said , i will restore my edits , and we will await further feedback. please dont attack the contributer , comment on the content , and lets see what suggestions you have to improve it .

Fdiamond (talk) 13:10, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've specified my objections in my edit summary and my 2nd sentence above. It's far to much unsourced material to add and expect others to source. And I am part of the Wikipedia community. Dougweller (talk) 13:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC) dont take it personally . please dont revert anything without consensus . if you would like to state your opinion , please do so in the discussion page . which aspects do you object to ? please feel free to improve the article , by rewriting any offending articles. please contain this to the facts . I will repost this in the discussion page , and we can await further opinions . I think you are being hasty . please dont knock the house down before its been built . give it a few days , and lets see. I appreciate your opinion , but you dont speak on behalf of the wikipedia community. lets discuss it , and await futher input. Fdiamond (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2010 (UTC)