User talk:Horkana

Use the article talk pages, and provide proper edit summaries. I am unlikely to read messages written here and even less likely to reply to them.

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 13:25, 9 June 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Repeated_insertion_of_gigantic_nonfree_image_without_fair_use_justification[reply]

In from the AN/I discussion. That image is purely decorative for the way you're using it. If you continue edit warring, you will be blocked. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:50, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 3 hours, for edit warring on Jessica Biel. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Horkana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Misunderstanding of image formatting. Only from discussion on article Talk page has it become clear that others were seeing the full image directly in the article, rather than the link text I was seeing. I can understand how leaving out that extra colon would make my edits seem disruptive and not in the good faith they were intended and I can no see the deletes were actually in good faith too.
See my other edits. I am actively engaged in improving the article, diff the current version of the article compared to before I edited a few days ago.

Decline reason:

You don't seem to understand why you are blocked. See WP:EDITWAR and it might make it clearer. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:27, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Horkana/Jessica Biel

Hi. Do you still want this subpage? See the attribution template on the User talk:Horkana/Jessica Biel page. If you don't really want this, we should have it deleted. {{db-u1}} for you, {{db-g7}} for me. Cheers, Jack Merridew 19:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since the content was disputed there is no point at all doing it in a Sandbox. Better to make many small edits to the article. Thanks for trying but once more and yet again this is has been just way too much hassle to make small improvements to an obviously weak article. -- Horkana (talk) 01:22, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Knight and Day

Please, engage in discussion, at Talk:Knight and Day. -- Cirt (talk) 14:20, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]