Jump to content

User talk:Geiremann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Geiremann (talk | contribs) at 18:22, 29 June 2010 (→June 2010: I didn't wish any discomfort rest assured of that. Thank you for your kind instructing.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Geiremann, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

3RR

Warning
Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.Canterbury Tail talk 13:48, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Number of the Beast

Numerous editors have reverted you contribution to the Number of the Beast article. If you believe the disputed content should be added, create a section in its Talk page, but do not add it until a consensus has been reached. If you would like to open a Request for Arbitration, read here. If you have any further questions/comments please reply here and place a {{talkback}} tag on my talk page. Thanks,. Stickee (talk) 13:47, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Geiremann. You have new messages at Stickee's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Geiremann. You have new messages at Talk:Number of the Beast.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Blocked for edit warring

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Canterbury Tail talk 14:52, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geiremann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't realize this rule for which I was blocked - repeated reverting -, and since that I have indeed made a new revised editing of the text as you may have seen I'm sure

Decline reason:

You were warned a full hour about 3RR before you were blocked. Considering the reaction to your edits, even a rewording of your edit after that many reversions was unwise without discussion on the talk page. Syrthiss (talk) 15:21, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geiremann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've decided to merely make reference links to sources for now, no text. Kindly unblock me; thank you.

Decline reason:

Twenty-four hours doesn't seem too long to wait to contribute in the way you say you want to; it's a standard first step in the protection of Wikipedia against 3RR and I see no reason to disturb it. Accounting4Taste:talk 16:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Geiremann (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

24 hour period is over now, but editing still not possible. Kindly unblock; thank you.

Decline reason:

Your math is not correct; your block will expire at 14:52. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:04, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not edit war

As you're just coming of a block for edit warring on the Number of the Beast page, and the consensus on the talk page is to not include your addition, I would suggest you stop trying to push it into the article and join in the discussion on the article's talk page. Dayewalker (talk) 15:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:CONSENSUS. Dougweller (talk) 15:38, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obama conspiracies

I've reverted your edits at Newsweek, to be perfectly clear here, inserting material into Wikipedia linking Barack Obama with the Anti-Christ is a fringe belief. Anywhere on the encyclopedia you'd like to insert that material, I'd strongly advise you to discuss it on the talk page first. If you'll look at this section [1], you'll see where that particular theory is covered. Dayewalker (talk) 16:45, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a serious warning

Right now, you're presenting the appearance of someone who is only at Wikipedia to promote his own point of view. That is not okay even in cases where a person's point of view is widely held by reasonable people; in this case, where your point of view is a fringe idea, it is even more glaring. You are not going to succeed in adding your point of view to Wikipedia. If you are interested in being a participant at Wikipedia, you're going to need to find other subjects to write about, subjects which you can write about in a factual, neutral way. If you continue trying to use Wikipedia to promote your point of view, you will be blocked from editing. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is a misunderstanding, I'm not doing what you say I am. I'm merely speaking about an article which was published by the major magazine Newsweek. Nothing more. Thank you. Geiremann (talk) 17:51, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a misunderstanding; I think that I understand your intentions accurately. If you continue making edits attempting to add to Wikipedia the incorrect information that Barack Obama is the Anti-Christ, either directly or indirectly, you will be blocked. -17:56, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

OK, I'll go to the page McGeddon gave me advising me to write there on the Number of the Beast page. That's for fringe theories. So people will not be unsettled. Thanks. Geiremann (talk) 18:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Lisa Miller (journalist). Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. - SummerPhD (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, for that, I wrote expressedly in the posting comment that it was all just friendly joking but I'll refrain from any kind of such from now on, be assured. Geiremann (talk) 18:22, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Geiremann&oldid=370828025"