Talk:Murano glass

Italy Redirect‑class High‑importance

	Italy portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Glass NA‑class High‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Glass, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of glass on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GlassWikipedia:WikiProject Physics/Taskforces/GlassTemplate:WikiProject Glassglass articles
NA	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Lacking quality

This article doesn't do justice to Murano glass; if you didn't already know what it is, you'd think it was just an interesting novelty after reading this article. There should be more pictures of glass sculptures so as to reflect the quality and craftsmanship that goes into this glass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Owen214 (talk • contribs) 14:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguity

I really think that the information in this article, also if formelly correct, are ambiguous in several parts and for several reasons. Obviously these are only my opinions and everybody is free tho think in a different way. You can read below my personal doubts and questions:

The Vetro Artistico® Murano mark [1] administered by the Promovetro Consortium [2] certifies the origin of glass products produced on the island of Murano.

Not true, or at least ambiguous. It seems that every glass made in Murano should be certificated by the Vetro Artistico® Murano mark ; it is not true: only a (small) part of the Murano's glassmakers/companies are memeber of the Consortium and uses the trademark.

(...) The existence of the Vetro Artistico® Murano [3] is a guarantee of the quality and originality of products coming from such a millenary and unique tradition as that of Murano glass making.

Not true. Some of the members of the Vetro Artistico® Murano mark use not traditional techniques. More: expecially the more "artistic" glassmakers (Salvadore, Tagliapietra, Zilio, Fuin, just to have few names) and some of the most famous brands (as Venini) aren't part of the Consortium. Instead are part of the Consortium people working with pyrex or using electric fusing kiln or with other very modern production process.

(...) Today there are more than 50 concessionary companies and their products can be bought in all sales outlets displaying the sticker with the mark.

True. Only 50 companies. Only a small part of the Murano glass companies and studios.

(...) The Consortium, authentic custodian of the Murano art(...)

Imho, with only 50 companies and with the main part of the high end glass producers out the consortium, the Vetro Artistico® Murano mark represent only its own 50 members, not the Murano art. The art of venetian glassmaking is of every skilled venetian glassmakers who works with passions, with or without pseudo-official marks.

This is just my personal opinion. I respect everybody who thinks in a different way.

Sincerely

Marco

Murano Glass vs. Made with Murano Glass

I'd like to see a distinction made between glass objects produced in Italy using Italian Murano glass and objects made outside of Italy using Italian Murano glass. There are a number of companies (incorrectly, intentionally misleading IMO) referring to their products as Murano Glass, when these products are massed produced in China using Murano glass rods.

Jen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.106.149.191 (talk) 18:50, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

I feel that although these subjects are related, one article would be far too big and that the seperate articles have potential to become much bigger PhilB ~ ^T/_C 12:40, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will probably be expanding (a little) and merging these articles within the next week or so. I lean towards merging the Murano glass article into the Venetian glass article since the venetian glass article can encompass all glass foundries besides that of Murano. I guess I want to see if there are any objections to this merge before I go ahead and do that. --ImmortalGoddezz (t/c) 15:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

as a glass artist myself, I *HIGHLY* suggest these articles be kept separate, because venice has a glass history far longer than when they shipped those guys to murano. they're interwoven, but separate, subjects, from an art history perspective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.124.138.11 (talk) 16:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

if you look at the content of the two articles I highly suggest that these two articles be merged. The content is repetitive and murano glass is a type of venetian glass. There is not enough unique content to have a substantial murano glass article and I recommend deletion of the murano glass page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.95.211.74 (talk) 23:51, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that these articles should rightfully be merged into one. There is quite a bit of repetition between the murano glass and the venetian glass articles. Murano Glass needs to be a section within the Venetian Glass page.

Material

There is a Samsung 1080p HDTV demo disc, which has a 10-minute clip on Murano glassmaking. It is titled "Masterpieces of Glass Art". The same disc also contains a short video about Tahiti islands and sportscar design shapes. 82.131.210.162 (talk) 14:02, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Murano Glass Today

The first few lines are very... awkwardly written. (Particularly "Today's glass production in Murano has been made by masterglass and his factory; They made glass like their ancient", which is complete Engrish) Could they be revised make it a bit more more readable? No offense intended towards the author of the original lines, of course.

- Draewn —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.101.164.246 (talk) 02:35, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that was terrible, I have cleaned it up. Mfield (talk) 02:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]