User talk:112.118.149.119

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Victoria City has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 16:14, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May I know why it wasn't constructive? 112.118.149.119 (talk) 16:15, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain why it wasn't constructive? If it was an error would you please clarify? 112.118.149.119 (talk) 01:21, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on the page List of professional sports leagues worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing and its related help page for more information. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:35, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was not a test. [1] 112.118.149.119 (talk) 19:36, 10 July 2010 (UTC) It was just a typo. 112.118.149.119 (talk) 01:20, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop adding erroneous categories to articles, I have found more than 10 articles with erroneous categories or categories that don't exist. Seeing that previous warnings are not working, you are getting a level 3 warning. Momo san ^Gespräch 13:22, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May I know which categories are erroneous? 112.118.149.119 (talk) 19:03, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? 112.118.149.119 (talk) 01:21, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing pattern concerns me

Repeating this from my talk page:

A week ago I was asked if you were the same as banned User:Instantnood who was currently causing trouble on a different IP range [2]. Over the past few days I was fairly certain you were not because of differences in editing style working with tables [3] and that you approached, but did not really go over the line [4] of making disruptive edits of the type that Instantnood does. In the last few days however; your edits and the other IP addresses which are confirmed to be Instantnood have overlapped, [5] [6] to the point that you are reverting people who reverted the other IP range. It is awfully convenient for you to take up the other IP addresses issues a few hours after the other address was banned. I do not believe this is simple common interest. You are either sharing a computer/IP address so some of his edits come from your IP, and/or you are in direct communication and acting as puppets for each other, and/or you have decided to follow other editors (myself [7] and others) and re-engage in his revert wars [8] [9] over POV issues in the same manner that he does. These are all behaviors that will get you banned on Wikipedia. I highly suggest, if you are not Instantnood, you create a username and make a decision to use your time on Wikipedia constructively instead of engaging in combative behaviors. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 00:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. The same thing may have probably happened with other users from Hong Kong. [10] Over the past few days I was trying to get lists that are sort by country into Category:Lists by country. I noticed from my observations that on most of the lists Hong Kong and other non-independent countries are listed in the same way as other countries. But for some of the lists, this is not the case; and on some lists, Hong Kong is missing. I therefore edit these lists following the usual practice. Is there anything wrong? Your editing behaviour came to my concern [11] when you started undoing my edits with no reason given.[12] And you actually decline to explain.[13] The natural response would be reverting your unexplained reverts.., anyone would do the same to such anti-etiquette behaviour. And from there on I started following your edits to make sure this is not going to happen again. I didn't even know by doing so my edits overlap with those of that IP address. 112.118.149.119 (talk) 01:23, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.