Talk:Paleobotany

Plants Start‑class Top‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Paleobotany is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://iop.biodiversity.org.uk/
- In Paleobotany on Mon Jul 17 16:26:40 2006, Socket Error: (111, 'Connection refused')
- In Paleobotany on Thu Jul 27 00:59:49 2006, Socket Error: (111, 'Connection refused')

maru (talk) contribs 05:00, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

Since there is no single form for a "plant fossil" it seems reasonable to merge information about such fossils into the article on Paleobotany, which is the science that deals with plant fossils. Much of the information about the interpretation of such fossils would otherwise be duplicated between the articles. --EncycloPetey 03:39, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I agree, good idea. Aelwyn 15:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merged articles. --EncycloPetey 03:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article Cryptospores

I am attempting to de-orphan the above article. I have added a link to it in the See Also section. However, it would probably be better if someone more knowledgeable than I work a link into the text. Or perhaps merge the article in completely. Thanks. --Sophitessa (talk) 05:39, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Subjective statement

"One of the most spectacular of plant fossils is petrified wood."

This is very subjective and should be changed.