User talk:Tcncv

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Thanks !

Thanks for the help on the NFL article, i didn't know how to protect an article.. yet :P im still a newbie ! T-oliveira (talk) 01:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Requests for protection may be submitted to WP:FRPP, but sometimes we see the activity ourselves and take the initiative. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:37, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank ye :)

OnePt618 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thank you for your quick action regarding User:Schwimmen82 :)-- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 05:07, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. If the disruption continues from other IP's or accounts, you can request page protection at WP:RFPP. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 05:09, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

404 error RfPP

Could you elaborate on your request to protect 404 error? I see no evidence of an attach at either the redirect or the redirect. Thank you. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:40, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe this help Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 01:41, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Responding at original thread.) -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Love But Not Betrayed

I did nothing wrong. I want to know why i can't put something up and then it keeps getting deleted. I can take down the deletion anytime i want. Yall did this to me months back and i am back for revenge. Oh, yea this isn't a threat just a promise. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Senior2011 (talk • contribs) 06:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm disappointed to hear that you appear to have no intent or working constructively within the system. I was actually interesting in finding out what your sources were for the article. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 15:06, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brea Police Department Content

Please HELP-

I am asking for your help with this matter, I read you postings and it appears you are reasonable and understanding.

The information in regard to the shooting incident is factual however I understand that Wiki is supposed to be neutral it deserves to be posted because it did occur and has to do with the Brea Police Department. Perhaps it can be re worded- could you take a go at it so that it can be presented as information.

Additionally their was a CA State law passed based on what happended to Chad MacDonald and his involvement with the Brea Police Department, as information it should be known, perhaps you have a better way to re word them- both pieces of info were referenced the shooting by the pres release from the Brea Police Department.

Please inform and help it would be greatly appreciated

thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faumf (talk • contribs) 01:03, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am only one voice whose opinion counts no more than anyone else's, and in this case, since I am not familiar with the subject matter, I am not in a good position to propose a rewrite. I suggest taking this to the article's talk page and proposing the addition there and working with the other editors to find a solution that covers the facts in the case, and attempt to also cover differing points of view in an unbiased manner. (You will need to set aside your own opinions to do this.) Be sure to back up the material with reliable sources (such as mainstream media coverage and official reports). If you and the other editors cannot reach an agreement, invite other to participate using some of the avenues described under WP:Dispute resolution. Good luck. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 01:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your question

Oddly, I don't see any contributions from the IP you listed at all. You might mean a similar one. Anyway, since the affected user has received IP block exemption, if there's sufficient acting up, the IP in question can just be reblocked and it oughtn't affect the user at all. - Vianello (Talk) 02:26, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at User talk:Vianello. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 02:39, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, when I look at it through your link I see it fine. Odd. I think I may have just somehow input it wrong. Anyway, by all means go ahead! (Sorry for not complying with your talk page guidelines by the by, missed those as well) - Vianello (Talk) 03:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. The edit filters picked up more vandalism from the IP, so I've reinstated the long term block. Thanks. -- Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 03:15, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think Electronic body music could be protected for more than one week. Maybe one month. The disruptive IP is continously "promising" to continue vandalism (see [1] where he makes this stament). You can see how disruptive he is also in the history [2]. Thanks . 89.139.161.224 (talk) 23:56, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]