Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of controversial album art

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Arbitrary and vague inclusion criteria with very few citations. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:19, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep could easily be defined by news stories identifying album covers as such. There are several notable examples which come to mind immediately and I figure there has been a chapter in some rock book discussing this somewhere somehow. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable topic. If you'd like to discuss narrowing the inclusion criteria, the talkpage is awaiting your initial input... -- Quiddity (talk) 20:39, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep though the article is only partly referenced at the moment, the topic is a good one and most of it should be easy to verify. Maybe a good rule of thumb should be to include only examples where the art was actually changed. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 20:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Interesting topic, worth covering, and NOTCENSORED. With appropriate sourcing in this list, there's no reason this couldn't be an FL someday. Jclemens (talk) 21:49, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Unless there is clear inclusion criteria and references this article would seem to run the risk of WP:Synthesis and WP:POV--Utinomen (talk) 22:24, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]