Jump to content

User:DASHBotAV/False Positive Reports

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User:DASHBotAV

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 68.55.212.251 (talk) at 19:27, 25 September 2010 (→False Positive Report from 68.55.212.251: sign). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

False Positive Report from Tim1357

  • User: Cineplex (talk) made an edit to the page: Marmaduke (film)
  • The bot discovered this: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:12:09
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 68
  • Regexs matched:
(?i)s+([^a-z]?)e+\1?x+\1?(e+\1?d+\1?|y+\1?|i*\1?e+\1?(s|r)+\1?(t\1?)?)?

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments
To do.. fix so sex has less of a score, or make higher score threshold for this size edit. Tim1357 talk 20:17, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Fixed Tim1357 talk 20:26, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Tim1357

[A-Z\'\;\!\s]{12,}

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:18, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Not a false positive, but questionable...

False Positive Report from Tim1357

  • User: Allnightlong44 (talk) made an edit to the page: Wouldn't You
  • The bot discovered this: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:04:51
  • The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 1
  • Regexs matched:
[A-Z\'\;\!\s]{12,}

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:24, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments
Fixed Tim1357 talk 20:24, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Tim1357

(?i)n+([^a-z]?)i+\1?g+\1?g*\1?(e+\1?r+\1?|a+\1?)[sz]*\1?

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments
Green tickY Fixed Tim1357 talk 20:28, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Tim1357

  • User: 86.134.35.25 (talk) made an edit to the page: [[��lvaro Arbeloa]]
  • The bot discovered this: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:03:45
  • The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 8
  • Regexs matched:
[A-Z\'\;\!\s]{12,}

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments
Already Fixed

False Positive Report from Tim1357

  • User: Trecel (talk) made an edit to the page: Enrique Lambatan
  • The bot discovered this: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:53:39
  • The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 12
  • Regexs matched:
[A-Z\'\;\!\s]{12,}

Report Genorated (they may have been altered in the time since): 20:41, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

  • User: 75.73.209.32 (talk) made an edit to the page: Farmers of Forty Centuries
  • The bot discovered this: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 01:38:31
  • The bot determined the score was -4, and the edit size was 143
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
([A-Z]{3,}[\s\n\!]{,4}){3,}
(?i)(19|20)\d\d

Report Genorated: 00:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments
Not sure. Sole Soul (talk) 00:06, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Yes, this matched the Screaming regex. It has caused me so much trouble that I think I'll turn it entirely off. Tim1357 talk 02:31, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

  • User: 98.237.225.159 (talk) made an edit to the page: J. R. Richards
  • The bot discovered this: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 01:15:26
  • The bot determined the score was -4, and the edit size was 61
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
([A-Z]{3,}[\s\n\!]{,4}){3,}

Report Genorated: 00:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments
This has already been fixed. Tim1357 talk 02:32, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

  • User: Kindzmarauli (talk) made an edit to the page: Kate Pierson
  • The bot discovered this: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:57:45
  • The bot determined the score was -4, and the edit size was 319
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)g+([^a-z]?)a+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|s+\1?t+\1?)|s+\1?)?
(?i)(19|20)\d\d

Report Genorated: 00:42, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments
Fixed. This would have been not reverted because it included ref tags. Tim1357 talk 02:38, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

  • User: 86.83.145.54 (talk) made an edit to the page: Professor Dr. Sospeter Muhongo
  • The bot discovered this: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 00:51:51
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 49
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
([A-Z]{3,}[\s\n\!]{,4}){3,}

Report Genorated: 00:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Note: "Genorated" in "Report Genorated" above is a typo, it should be "Generated"

User Comments
Bad edit, but vandalism probably was not intended. Sole Soul (talk) 00:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
I can't see that edit, but it is the product of the aforementioned screwey regex that has since been changed to be much less inclusive. Tim1357 talk 02:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
P.S. Thanks for correcting my typo, I fixed it in the script. Tim1357 talk 02:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

[A-Z][^a-z]{30,}

Report Generated: 19:54, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from Rotsor

  • User: Rotsor (talk) made an edit to the page: Braga
  • The bot discovered this: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 00:21:09
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was -17
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
[A-Z][^a-z]{30,}

Report Generated: 00:24, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

User Comments
Removed altogether. Tim1357 talk 00:58, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 96.54.179.70 (Diff:379549496)

The swear is part of the bands name "the fuck you pigs" is a band that the cretin, a member of the dayglo abortions plays for. i added it to associated acts.

Thank you for your report. That band name has been whitelisted. Sorry for the inconvenience. Tim1357 talk 12:38, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Tim1357 (Diff:379536927)

take a look at this.

False positive report from JohnCD (Diff:379603862)

Newbie user submitted a page, which was tagged A7; newbie then blanked it, and Dashbot reverted and issued a warning. This is WP:BITEy and very confusing for a newbie; Dashbot needs to be able to distinguish "page blanked by author" and either leave it alone or tag with {{db-g7}}. (Made worse here because two human editors then did the same thing. Now to apologise to the newbie and educate the other two... ) JohnCD (talk) 17:08, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Done, I saw that just five minutes before you did (in fact I think it happened twice). I'll leave an apology as well. Thanks for not getting angry :). Tim1357 talk 18:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from BelindaEdgeworth (Diff:379643271)

I'm sorry, I'm new to this and didn't know about "the sandbox"; the frequency of small changes and edits subsequent to proofreading is I assume what attracted the notice of the bot and prompted the reversal of changes which, while not very substantial, were certainly not vandalism.

Very sorry. I replied on BE's talk page. Tim1357 talk 21:15, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 108.5.66.83 (Diff:379819169)

false positive on the bot... the quote by greg proops is misrepresented and erroneous, and the bot won't allow correction of this.

Hmm, terribly sorry about that. The bot went down for a bit, so the 1 Revert Rule was ignored. Im going to look into how to make this better. Tim1357 talk 19:14, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 199.247.84.65 (Diff:379837965)

Added the band Fuck Buttons to the list of musicians and groups using the Casiostereo keyboard. They do use it, as mentioned in the Fuck Buttons page.

Added to white list. Thank you for bringing this to my attention and sorry for the inconvenience. Tim1357 talk 13:40, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from EvilExe (Diff:379864536)

Removed censoring of the word "fucking."

Working on it. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, and sorry for the inconvenience. Tim1357 talk 13:47, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from JohnCD (Diff:379913591)

This is a more difficult one, but once again a user was trying (less politely this time) to remove his own autobiographical page, and was enraged by being reverted and accused of vandalism both by Dashbot and by humans. JohnCD (talk) 10:26, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. That seems to be deleted. I cant really fix it without being able to see it, so maybe you can email the diff to me here. Thanks, Tim1357 talk 13:44, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Without having seen the article, maybe I'll add an exception for authors of pages. That is to say, if a user created an article, then they cannot be reverted on that page. Tim1357 talk 14:02, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 65.25.33.88 (Diff:379964557)

I removed the censoring of "bullshit" (written as b******t) from Taleb's page and replaced it with the real word. That's not vandalism! Wikipedia is not supposed to be censored... :(

You're right and I'm working on it. Sorry for the inconvenience. Tim1357 talk 13:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 99.27.235.78 (Diff:379886382)

There are at least 2 of the games that I personally own that I edited the page about. I couldn't pst a link to it because you removed the page about the game. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion_%28company%29 however proves that there is a company that exists that has both the games I own and the other one that I intend to obtain in the future. I would appreciate if you would not remove my post while trying to help other people know more about the games from certain developers.

False positive report from 76.109.242.141 (Diff:380093034)

Profanity is not vandalism, every page you have on this site is pure opinion by users with no true fact verification. What some may find to be true others may consider fake. The fact that you veto what you feel is accurate and fraudulent is asinine. Your site is founded on freedom of speech but you show no consideration for such fact. If people consider my post to be free speech they will change it accordingly that is the beauty of wikipedia. Automatically remove said comments does not allow freedom of expression and only allows what you believe is accurate. I am very disappointed in what censure has been placed on this site

Sorry, but this is defiantly not a false positive. Take a look at the intro to wikipedia. Tim1357 talk 13:37, 21 August 2010 (UTC)r

False positive report from 79.138.187.64 (Diff:380030018)

While I can guess, it is unclear why my slight change to the article about Vanessa Paradis was not considered constructive.

On the contrary, any cached version of that page could be retrived in the future and give the wrong impression that it is generally not considered controversial for a non-married couple to have children out of wedlock in our time. By labelling their children as "illegitimate" or "bastard", it will convey the sense that not everyone in our time approved of such arrangements without necessarily suggesting that *all* people disapprove. Someone who does not find anything wrong with having illegitimate children would not object to the label "illegitimate". It think it is important to convey that in our time that we did not all excuse our celebrity entertainers for actions that would have common laypeople labelled.

False positive report from 69.234.107.29 (Diff:381021682)

i edited a quote. someone had replaced the word "fucking" with "(bleep)ing" in a quote from mark wahlberg, which i felt was unnecessary and dangerous to free speech, so i fixed it.

False positive report from 173.52.67.121 (Diff:381047699)

Wrong track listing you tool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.52.67.121 (talk • contribs)

Sorry about that. Your edit got caught in the filter for the word "dumb". I tweaked it so that "dum" by itself will not get caught, but "dummy" will. Sorry for the inconvenience. Tim1357 talk 15:47, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 99.183.193.109 (Diff:381048766)

I change the mascot of St Thomas from "the eagles" to "eagles" and it reported me. That is absurd! Dashbot needs to be shut off.

Hah. Maybe not. Tim1357 talk 15:38, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from 71.21.195.23 (Diff:381000333)

The text added was Danny McBride's most notable line from the movie, given as a point of reference for mainstream fans.

False positive report from 24.8.14.9 (Diff:381567087)

I disagree with DashBot's revision back to the original page on my revisions to "The Big Lebowski". I believe the article to be mostly sound, but there are several places where I feel it is sloppily written and leaves out certain major plot points as to make the synopsis somewhat incomprehensible. Please consider keeping my revisions in. Thank you.

Terribly sorry about that. I tweaked the bots settings, so this type of error will not happen again. Thanks for reporting it! Tim1357 talk 21:52, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Spencro (Diff:381755479)

The edit added detail to the nature of the prize that this author has won. The prize is not a well-known one, and is not featured on Wikipedia, so the additional detail is useful for clarification.

False positive report from Jdawg94 (Diff:381803373)

My edit was true!

Hah, almost had me there. Tim1357 talk 02:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Robber93 (Diff:381813331)

I changed the redirect page for "Boob Lady", as the old page redirected to a page of one time Simpsons characters where her name didn't exist on the page. I changed the redirect to a different page of recurring characters (she makes 2 appearances throughout the series).

Very Sorry. This edit would not have been reverted today, as I added an exclusion for large edits, such as this. Thanks for alerting me. Tim1357 talk 14:29, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Sole Soul (Diff:381831398)

[1]. Sole Soul (talk) 07:39, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

False positive report from Hyperhippy92 (Diff:381915107)

I was simply explaining how the closed captioning was in fact, uncensored, on a reference of a certain episode of Family Guy in the Robot Chicken page, and also, given the massive quantities of the phrase, "F--k you!" in that page, I thought another use of it wouldn't hurt... but this is why Wikipedia should be censored with partial reverts instead of full reverts, AND NOT FULL REVERTS! Also, if saying "F--k" is so wrong, I say that the whole reference section be deleted, and not by revert either, someone needs to take the time, and delete the entire reference section the old way, by editing the page, highlighting the section, and pressing the backspace or delete key like a normal person, and not automatically revert a page to it's previous state like a robot. If I can't say "F--k" on a page full of "F--k"'s, then no one can say "F--k", period, even if it's a page on the history of the word "F--k".

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

  • User: 207.6.49.207 (talk) made an edit to the page: The Wrestler (2008 film)
  • The bot discovered this: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:13:18
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 8
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)b+u+tt+[sz\$]*

Report Generated: 02:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

"headbutt" is a pro wrestling term , see Professional_wrestling_aerial_techniques#Diving_headbutt. Sole Soul (talk) 02:39, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, and fixed. Tim1357 talk 11:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 81.153.73.91

  • User: 81.153.73.91 (talk) made an edit to the page: Gang colors
  • The bot discovered this: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:25:26
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 4
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 15:29, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

User Comments
This is probably not a false positive. The bot was correct in its revert. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 18:41, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Yep. Tim1357 talk 22:27, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Wottnot

  • User: Wottnot (talk) made an edit to the page: Exhibitionism
  • The bot discovered this: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:41:34
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 39
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)(t+[i\!1]+t+|b+[o0]{2,}b+)([i\!1]+e+[s\$]+|y+|[sz]+)?

Report Generated: 22:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Fixed Tim1357 talk 23:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 71.68.203.101

  • User: 71.68.203.101 (talk) made an edit to the page:
  • The bot discovered this: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:25:38
  • The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 144
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)(b+u+ll+|d+[o0]+g+|c+[o0]+w+|d+u+m+b+)?[\-]?[s\$]+([^a-z\s]?)h+\2?[i\!1]+\2?t+\2?((t+\2?)e+\2?(d|r)+\2?|[s\$]+\2?|z+\2?|t*\2?(y+|(i|y)+(\2?e+\2?[s\$]+\2?t+|l+\2?y+|e+\2?r+))\2?)?

Report Generated: 22:51, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Fixed Tim1357 talk 23:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 205.237.167.169

  • User: 205.237.167.169 (talk) made an edit to the page: Okapi
  • The bot discovered this: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 23:03:32
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 14
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)w+[\@a4]+[\$sz]+ h+e+r+e+
W+[\@A4]+[\$SZ]+ H+E+R+E+

Report Generated: 23:05, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Nope. Tim1357 talk 23:52, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 67.184.68.87

  • User: 67.184.68.87 (talk) made an edit to the page: Fucking, Austria
  • The bot discovered this: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 01:05:39
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 0
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)(p+h+|f+)([^a-z]?)u+\2?(c+\2?k+|k+\2?c*)\2?(e+\2?r+\2?[\$sz]*\2?|[s\$]+\2?|(i|e)+\2?n+\2?(g+\2?)?|e+\2?d+\2?)?

Report Generated: 01:07, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments
I had an exlusion for pages with 'bad words' in their title. I turned that function off for some reason, and forgot to turn it back on. Done. Tim1357 talk 10:56, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Sole Soul

  • User: Fed250 (talk) made an edit to the page: The Buckethead Show
  • The bot discovered this: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:26:18
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 32
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)b+[o0]{2,}g+e+r+[sz\$]*

Report Generated: 21:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Sole Soul (talk) 21:51, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Tweaked the regex for 'boogers' to be less harsh. Tim1357 talk 13:57, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 86.28.149.134

  • User: 86.28.149.134 (talk) made an edit to the page: Two-Spirit
  • The bot discovered this: Fri, 03 Sep 2010 17:29:13
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 42
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 17:45, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Fixed Tim1357 talk 02:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 24.46.68.224

  • User: 24.46.68.224 (talk) made an edit to the page: Spring Heeled Jack
  • The bot discovered this: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 00:21:51
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 0
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)p+u+[s\$]{2,}(i|y)+e*[zs]*

Report Generated: 00:23, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments
I don't see how this was an appropriate edit. Can you explain why it was? Tim1357 talk 13:54, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Bigger digger

  • User: 72.28.58.38 (talk) made an edit to the page: Shane Dawson
  • The bot discovered this: Sat, 04 Sep 2010 03:47:08
  • The bot determined the score was -4, and the edit size was 223
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)f+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?g+\1?(g+\1)?(([o0]|[i\!1])+\1?t+\1?)?[zs\$]*\1?
(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 04:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC) Confusing article, so I might be wrong. I stumbled across the IP after it later made mass deletions to a different article, but I think it has been false-positived here due to the re-arranging of two uses of the word "faggot" that were already in the article. Hope that makes sense, most of the article didn't! Bigger digger (talk) 04:13, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 90.194.3.241

(?i)(rotf)?lmf?(h|[\@a4])[o0]
(ROTF)?LMF?(H|[\@A4])[O0]
(?i)\([^\(\)]+?\)

Report Generated: 00:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

Missing in the article was the featuring music group LMFAO, which was correctly put in the article. Bot has reverted edit wrongly thinking user wrote something else. 90.194.3.241 (talk) 00:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from 24.184.103.149

  • User: 24.184.103.149 (talk) made an edit to the page: Waifu
  • The bot discovered this: Sun, 05 Sep 2010 06:37:56
  • The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 9
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)(\[\^\+?\]\]|\{\{[^\}]+?\}\})
<Replaced content with someting esle, as acording to edit summary.>

Report Generated: 06:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

The intention of the edit was to replace a redirect I considered spam (such things crop up, for instance something such as "Flaming homosexual" -> "Gerard Way") with a speedy delete template. --24.184.103.149 (talk) 06:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Green tickYFixed. Tim1357 talk 21:54, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

False Positive Report from Tim1357

  • User: 75.202.130.63 (talk) made an edit to the page: Rudy Gay
  • The bot discovered this: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 01:20:39
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 5
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 14:50, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from 79.11.199.154

  • User: 79.11.199.154 (talk) made an edit to the page: NSFW. A hunter shoots a bear!
  • The bot discovered this: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:14:29
  • The bot determined the score was -3, and the edit size was 43
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)(b+u+ll+|d+[o0]+g+|c+[o0]+w+|d+u+m+b+)?[\-]?[s\$]+([^a-z\s]?)h+\2?[i\!1]+\2?t+\2?((t+\2?)e+\2?(d|r)+\2?|[s\$]+\2?|z+\2?|t*\2?(y+|(i|y)+(\2?e+\2?[s\$]+\2?t+|l+\2?y+|e+\2?r+))\2?)?

Report Generated: 13:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from Teohhanhui

  • User: Teohhanhui (talk) made an edit to the page: Kevin Walker (Brothers & Sisters)
  • The bot discovered this: Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:55:21
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 0
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)g+([^a-z]?)[\@a4]+\1?y+\1?(e+\1?(r+\1?|[s\$]+\1?t+\1?)|[\$zs]+\1?)?

Report Generated: 14:56, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

False Positive Report from 68.55.212.251

  • User: 68.55.212.251 (talk) made an edit to the page: Numbers game
  • The bot discovered this: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:21:38
  • The bot determined the score was -2, and the edit size was 0
  • Regexs matched (they may have been altered in the time since):
(?i)n+([^a-z]?)[i\!1]+\1?g\1?g+\1?(e+\1?r+\1?|a+\1?)[sz]*\1?

Report Generated: 19:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

User Comments

This was the restoration of a sourced relevant valid use of a potentially offensive word. 68.55.212.251 (talk) 19:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:DASHBotAV/False_Positive_Reports&oldid=386988291"