Jump to content

User talk:Henrik

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by FIL (talk | contribs) at 11:33, 6 October 2010 (→‎stats.grok.se: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome! This is my user talk page. If you want to communicate with me for any reason, especially about pages I have made or edited, or any administrative actions I've performed, feel free to do so here.
I will generally reply here, unless you request otherwise. Please start a new section for new conversations.
About the pageviews statistics tool, you may want to read some FAQs before.

The traffic statistics tool is off for Feb 25 and 26 (4 days are missing this month)

The traffic statistics tool is off for Feb 25 and 26 (4 days are missing this month). Too bad ... Chassain (talk)

It doesn't work

It doesn't work. Again. And we don't know why. Best regards.


IP, 13 April 2010


    • Yeah, the stats are dead.

statistics

Is it possible to get one tabulation for all the hits/days for an article? I am trying to understand what the long term pattern of interest is for articles I wrote. User:Jurriaan 6 July 2010 11:00 (UTC) NO STATISTICS POSTED FOR THE MONTH OF SEPT FOR MICHAEL SABO —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.138.119.141 (talk) 01:21, 10 September 2010 (UTC) Dear Henrik! Tell me please, why do not maintain statistics poseschny current project and main. depo (talk) 16:18, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

Dear Mr. Henrik,

Thank you for your development. I have found it very useful. I know we editors are not suppose to have egos, but it is nice to know from time to time that the world finds the article we research and help others with are for some purpose.

Again, thanks.

Jack E. Hammond

.

Data for wikistats before 2010/04/01?

Hi, I've seen Wikistats at http://stats.grok.se/ . Great work! I was wondering if it is possible to get data of pageviews before 2010/04/01. Thanks! --phauly (talk) 08:03, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The page view data begins in December 2007. Emw (talk) 11:09, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, thanks for your answer! Sorry, I was not very precise in my question. I would like to get the raw data about pageviews. I've read that your visualization takes data from http://dammit.lt/wikistats/ but when I look into the archived raw data, I see that the oldest available dump is of April 2010, see http://dammit.lt/wikistats/archive/2010/04/ So I'm wondering if you make a local copy of the data released earlier and if it would be ok for you to share them. Thanks! phauly (talk) 11:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, sorru to bother you again ... ;( --phauly (talk) 14:01, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Date format in Page view statistics

Request to specify the date format in bracket 201009(yr-month) and so on. For a new user this is actually confusing. Then different formats are followed in different countries hence its better to specify. AkkiDa 03:57, 4 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Akshayapanigrahi (talkcontribs)

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

Hi there,

I am making a small research based on the "Wikipedia article traffic statistics".

I wonder if you can send me some information about this system and how its works. Any detail will contribute.

Please send it to my Email at:

dror.dagan@gmail.com


Thanks and Best Regards,

Dror —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.179.40.156 (talk) 10:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you delegate some of the page-stats upkeep work?

Hi Henrik, love the facility, and its continuous availability is becoming a must for WP. If it's a bore to add each month to the facility at the start of the month, I wonder whether it's possible to delegate this task. Thanks. Tony (talk) 06:10, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tony. I think that task is done automatically, although it is somewhat buggy. Emw (talk) 12:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Out of order again !

Yes, out of order again. Please, give us some news ! That's so strange... Regards.

IP, 11 September 2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.88.219.61 (talk) 06:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stats for Google missing Sept 9, stats for Yahoo missing Sept 9 & 10 Ottawahitech (talk) 15:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
stats are now working in most areas I have checked today. They resumed a couple of days ago, leaving a blank only in dates between Sept 8/10-Sept 15/16 . Thanks to whoever fixed them. Ottawahitech (talk) 17:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I spoke prematurely - stats are broken again, at least at Yahoo Groups. Ottawahitech (talk) 21:08, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The stats seem to come on and off on different articles at different times - why is it? Ottawahitech (talk) 17:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think the intermittent issues with page view data affect all pages. Have you seen an example of where this is not the case? Emw (talk) 11:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are Wikipedia's page view statistics not maintained by Wikipedia staff?

Henrik has been providing outstanding service in this area as a volunteer. However, this function is way too important for this organization to rely on one single individual.

Any thoughts? Ottawahitech (talk) 15:51, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like WMF staff are working to address this; see http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Analytics_upgrade and http://wikitech.wikimedia.org/view/OWA_deployment. According to the second link, a new analytics tool could be launched in early October.
Even if the staff didn't implement that project, however, a page view statistics tool is not dependent on Henrik. The underlying data is available from the Internet Archive, beginning at http://www.archive.org/details/wikipedia_visitor_stats_200712, and also at http://dammit.lt/wikistats/. Emw (talk) 17:11, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree : this function is way too important for this organization to rely on one single individual ! Best regards !

IP, 13 September 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.14.91.177 (talk) 13:55, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stats.grok.se– are all hits on a redirect counted?

Hi Henrik. I know the answer to this may depend on raw logs which you don't write, only process, but have you any idea if a hit on a redirect page that only results in a redirect (ie. not resulting in a rendering of the redirect page itself) actually produces a hit count? Many thanks, Trev M   10:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When one navigates to a URL that redirects to another page, that hit is listed for the redirect page. So if Foo was a redirect (and it is), then any hits on that page will be listed as for that page, not the target. Killiondude (talk) 17:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As suspected: thanks very much for confirmation. Trev M   17:21, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That doesn't seem clear to me. What I observe is that now traffic through a redirect counts as a view of the redirect and as a view of the target; views of the redirect itself do not count as a view of the target. 69.3.72.249 (talk) 01:13, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's correct, 69.3.72.249. Viewing the redirect itself (achievable through a URL like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foo?redirect=no) registers as a view of that page and that page only. However, such hits are so infrequent as to be negligible. The vast majority of hits to redirects occur without those special parameters -- through a URL like http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foo, i.e. Foo -- and register as views on both the redirect and the destination page. Emw (talk) 01:52, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stats question

Hi Henrik, On Sep. 12 this article Leymah Gbowee was featured on Did You Know, but the count for the page visit shows up as zero. Do you have any ideas? Thank you. USchick (talk) 15:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

Thanks for the traffic statistics page. Are you no longer updating it? If not, do you know of another way to track Wikipedia article statistics? Thanks, Bill3857 17:56, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's http://toolserver.org/~emw/wikistats/, but that uses Henrik's data. It's somewhat buggy at the moment, but it works for the most part. Emw (talk) 02:00, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

Please kindly take a look at statistics on the tam quyen phan lap pages, as I can not see how many people see my writting.

Thank you very much —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.21.209.161 (talk) 08:40, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to fix the page view statistics for Theophostic Counseling for August and September?

Is it possible to fix the page view statistics for Theophostic Counseling for August and September?

JohnSHolder (talk) 17:01, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About the page view counter

Hello Henrik. Is it possible that opening 10 or more stats pages at approx. the same time to block the counter? I thought this is deliberate and affects only me, and came here to find some info about avoiding it, but as I see, it affects other's stats too. John smith account (talk) 08:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Out of order again and again

Out of order again and again. Please, give us some informations. Thanks.

IP, 15 September 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.88.219.61 (talk) 08:23, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

Hi Henrik. Once more: Would it be possible to extend the range of the months automatically allways on the first day of the next month? I believe, this should be easy, and many wikipadians would be lucky. Greatings --Geisler Martin (talk) 15:44, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Traffic again…

Greets Henrik! I've got a favor to ask: would you mind refreshing stats for plwiki? The last monthly one was done for December 2009. Thanks in advance! Regards, konradek (talk) 16:50, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

Please, add into select box "September 2010" (201009). Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.32.164.80 (talk) 17:06, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hi my page Sherwood Cryer is stuck on the history view page can you help it has stayed the same for a week now!thanks Crystal —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cris57helpme (talkcontribs) 23:22, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it seems that not only the September 2010 does not work. Also the July is not working. Kind regards from Germany--KarlV :  DISC  10:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In September 2010, also 8 days are missing in a line. Please Henrik, give us an answer! Greetings from Germany!--79.219.4.227 (talk) 11:02, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Sabo August statistics

Can you update the page views for Michael Sabo for the month of August and currently in September. Statistics appear to be stuck from the middle of August 2010 on.Seasons1987 (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Followup Statistics for Michael Sabo

Could you please have the August and September statistics for Michael Sabo on Identity Theft update from the middle of August up until today? Thank you.Seasons1987 (talk) 02:17, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Traffic again and again

Would you mind refreshing stats, please ? It doesn't work, again and again ! That's a pity. Best regards.

IP, 18 September 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.14.91.177 (talk) 07:35, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Henrik hasn't been editing since March 2010, just for your information. Peaceworld111 (talk) 19:17, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot ! But who is concerned ? Who is responsible for ? Really, that's strange enough...

IMP, 20 September 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.14.91.177 (talk) 13:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

toolserver

Hi Henrik. Did you create this toolserver? If yes is it opensource? Benvewikilerim (talk) 14:45, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I created it. Setting up a Subversion repository is one of many things I intend to do on the project. I will also add a free license to the code. Emw (talk) 14:56, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rename an article

I made a mistake when I created an article called "Rise of lords". I would like to change the title to be "Rise of Lords" instead. is it possible for you to do so, because I don't have access to this function. Thanks a lot.

YL —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.75.167.214 (talk) 00:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No audience

Hello, it´s beena LONG TIME we see no audience results on th eportuguese wikipedia: http://stats.grok.se/pt/201009/Ad%C3%A3o_e_Eva. All articles lack numbers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.152.202.174 (talk) 14:00, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Yes, that's strange ! It doesn't work... and we have no explanation. Rather bad for Wikipedia.

IP, 20 September 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.14.91.177 (talk) 16:53, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Web traffic (yet again)

Hey Henrik,

Thanks for creating and designing the system to track wikipedia traffic numbers. I was looking through the traffic numbers for certain topics on the English language Wikipedia and noticed that for a few months in 2008 the user traffic to that page was 0. It does not seem to make sense to me that the page view for those months in 2008 would be 0. Is that possible or could it be a glitch in the tracking system?

Would appreciate it if you could get back to me.

Athena musing (talk) 20:46, 20 September 2010 (UTC)Athena_musing[reply]

That's a new problem, which has appeared some time in the last week. Data for January through June 2008 is missing. (Don't despair: it's available elsewhere, just difficult to get into a digestible form.) Emw (talk) 23:35, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

stats.grok.se update.

Hello. Can you please update the stats.grok.se data? Thank you, --Patriot8790 (talk) 18:55, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

Dear Henrik,

I much enjoy the little graphs you created to show page views of Wikipedia articles. These haven't been updated since August. Can you reinstate this service or is it now dead?

Regards, Skeptic2 (talk) 00:06, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • The stats still work for September it is only the pull-down list box that has not been updated yet. Until this gets fixed all you need to do is to select the article for August 10 and the tweek the URL by changing '201008' to '201009'. PeterEastern (talk) 08:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Traffic Counts - Ichalkaranji

Traffic Counts of Ichalkaranji is not working. Plz help.-- . Shlok talk . 19:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have greatly appreciated your Wikipedia traffic page, and thank you for creating it. Will you be continuing to offer it? Thanks, LoLosmp (talk) 22:04, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

Still something wrong in the September 2010

Article Herbert Wetterauer was posted on 22. Sep. 10; it's not possible, that it was shown 6 traffics a few days before, as the counter shows. --Hirt des Seyns (talk) 13:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Heading 'Ganit Forum (Khulna)' is not correct

The name of the forum is 'Ganit Forum Khulna'.In English: 'Mathematics Forum Khulna'. but i viewed that the title is not written properly. so pls change the name by omitting brackets. Thanks, K M Rabbani assistant professor, Mathematics Govt B L College, Khulna Joint secratery rabbani.khulna@gmail.com Ganit Forum Khulna —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.30.39.49 (talk) 14:09, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia article traffic statistics "temporarily unavailable"

For a couple of days now I have noticed this text when trying to obtain statistics: "stats.grok.se is currently being migrated to a new server. Some data may temporarily be unavailable"

I have not seen any announcements about it here. Just wondering if anyone knows what is going on. Ottawahitech (talk) 14:33, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

pageview stats for frrwiki

Hi, is it possible to add statistics about Nordfriisk wikipedia (frrwiki) to stats.grok.se? This would help to give the small local community more feedback about their work. Merlissimo 14:43, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

William James Wanless‎

Dear Henrik,

Article traffic statistics of William James Wanless is not working plz do the needful. plz help Thanks-- . Shlok talk . 15:17, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

hi henrik, nice to tele-meet you. i have a couple of questions about your stats.grok.se site. i was wondering if you had time for a quick chat or a couple questions. if so, is there a channel i can find you on? thanks. --Parul Vora (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Henrik hasn't edited since March, and may well not respond. Having built a tool at http://toolserver.org/~emw/wikistats/ that augments stats.grok.se by essentially piggy-backing off the data it provides, I have decent knowledge of Henrik's site. Perhaps you'd consider asking your questions here? Otherwise, if you'd like my input, I can be reached by email. Cheers, Emw (talk) 01:09, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

George KennethLucey Jr.

Ciao Henrik .... been all around you, but never Sweden. On the Article Traffic page, is there a way to see where they are coming from? Regards, George

Luceyg (talk) 23:10, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia article traffic statistics

Beloved Henrik,
(seriously ;), as your program is great help in evaluating possible relevance of articles), I just now notice that the languages to be chosen by dropdown menue do not appear by alphabetical order [I just now was looking for Polish].

I think it might possibly not be too much of an effort to have preset English as-is, but to list everything else of the dropdown by alphabetical order. Thanks, Wolfgang, [w.] 15:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The drop-down menu is roughly ordered by number of articles in the given language's version of Wikpedia. See http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias#All_Wikipedias_ordered_by_number_of_articles. Whether it's better to sort that way or alphabetically is an interesting design question: the former should be more convenient for most people, but the latter should leave most people not confused. Emw (talk) 16:16, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I_STILL_DO think that alphabetical order would be preferable in such dropdown, believing that
(1) not-very-very-many people use this feature,
...but, mainly,
(2) those who ever DO would hardly be aware of ANY other 'ratings' to be regarded.
-- How should they ever know, unless being statisticians???
But, do not mind, please. Best, [w.] 17:29, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd just like to commend your work with "Wikipedia article traffic statistics" that is a very valuable tool. I'm a gardener too by-the-way. :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Warrior777 (talkcontribs) 08:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

William James Wanless‎

Article traffic statistics of William James Wanless is not working accurately as Data has been changed now as I have noted the data this morning and now it shows something Deferent.Kindly help. Thanks.-- . Shlok talk . 14:53, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very much sorry IT is Working Well and I was mistakenly looking data of talk page. Very sorry.-- . Shlok talk . 15:00, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

Great Job...

Dear Henrik the page stats server goes like lightning now! Could you tell me what and how it happened? Did you get a Sun Unix fridge server? Would really love to know. Thanks again..--Oracleofottawa (talk) 02:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

stats.grok.se

Good day. I am writing a wikimedia bot library and think that using information from your service is a good idea. Can it be requested through the web as mediawiki pages? FIL (talk) 11:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]