Jump to content

User talk:Speidelj

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MelbCro (talk | contribs) at 23:57, 9 November 2010 (→‎Melbourne Knights logo). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Neven Subotić

Just remove the fake references and any content "supported" by the fake refs and warn the user. I'm not at all familiar with the Neven Subotić or his nationality, but it seems like the same user who was blocked for this same behavior is back at it. Thanks for calling my attention to it. Pinkadelica Say it... 23:55, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Talk:Prigrevica has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Bremerenator (talk) 17:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plavi Dunav

I know (I read his comment on same day, even I disagree with him), don't bather yourself with that. Anyway thanks. If you need something else... just live me a massage.----László (talk) 22:17, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jabuka

My source claim that settlers in Jabuka were Serbs (and it was written in the article already before you came). Also, if you do not agree with some parts of the article, you should change these parts only, not to remove entire contributions of other users. 212.69.0.46 (talk) 09:42, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please stop spaming village articles with site about Vojvodina Germans - content of that site speak about Germans in general and not about villages in whose articles you posted that - external links in articles are about subjects of the articles. 212.69.0.46 (talk) 09:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]


I deeply regret, that I have to discuss with an anonymous person, because you are not willing to out yourself. Why don´t you create an account and log yourself in? I don´t know anything about your intention, but I think you have a problem with Germans or with Germany. The German people in Vojvodina were Yugoslavian citizens. The young men from the German minority were serving and fighting for the Yugoslavian army until 1941. Afterwards they were forced to join the Prinz-Eugen-Division. You write, that the Germans were expulsed and killed by the Yugoslavian Partizans , because “95 %!” of them were members of the German Kulturbund. But even when there were some adults in that association, woul´d it be an excuse to kill children women and elder people? You have to accept, that the expulsion of the Germans happened, it took place and consequently became part of the history.
About the village Jabuka in banat. How can you claim, that 20.000 Serbs were killed in or near Jabuka? Where is the source? Why do you insist Serbian settlers when even Serbian social anthropologists say, that that the first settlers might be coming from Rumania or from Bulgaria.
Look at Simo Mladenovski: Banatsko selo Jabuka, Skopje 1988 , where the names are listed: Stoikov, Stepan, Pavao and Damian.
About the 20 Croats in Jabuka (one of them was my mother). You insist on that they were Serbs. If they were Serbs, why didn´t they go to the Romanian church. No, they went to the catholic church in Jabuka.
And please mind the other sources about Jabuka:
  • Revue des Etudes sud-est européennes, XL, 1-4, 2002. Seite 215
  • Zoran Janjetovic: Between Hitler and Tito, Belgrade 2000, S.14-17
  • Heimatortausschuss Jabuka: Heimatbuch der Ortsgemeinde Jabuka
  • Kaltenbrunner 1958, S.14
  • Peter Kottler 2007, S. 195 --Speidelj (talk) 14:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, Speidelj, I admit that you are right in one thing: the link that I provided to you indeed have an form that ask for your name and telephone, but you do not have to fill this form - all you have to do is to go to lower part of that page and to read history of Jabuka. Would you be so kind to do this, thank you: http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:m5yUnACBSbAJ:www.sopancevo.org.yu/30-1-l+jabuka+stratiste&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2 81.18.62.135 (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know whether the logo contains references to the Ustasha, but it is the actual logo of the club, and therefore it has a place in the article. Blackmissionary (talk) 23:13, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speidelj remove the club logo again and you will be reported for vandalism. (MelbCro (talk) 23:57, 9 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]