Jump to content

Food, Inc.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Anabananas27 (talk | contribs) at 07:13, 6 December 2010 (→Content). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Food, Inc.
Theatrical release poster
Directed byRobert Kenner
Produced byRobert Kenner
Elise Pearlstein
StarringEric Schlosser
Michael Pollan
Edited byKim Roberts
Distributed byMagnolia Pictures
Release dates
  • September 7, 2008 (2008-09-07) (TIFF)
  • June 12, 2009 (2009-06-12) (United States)
Running time
93 minutes
CountryTemplate:FilmUS
LanguageEnglish
Box office$4,606,199[1]

Food, Inc. is a 2008 American documentary film directed by Emmy Award-winning filmmaker Robert Kenner.[2] The film examines corporate farming in the United States, concluding that agribusiness produces food that is unhealthy in a way that is environmentally harmful and abusive of both animals and its employees. The film is narrated by Michael Pollan and Eric Schlosser.[3][4] The documentary was criticized by large American corporations engaged in industrial food production.[2]

§Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).==Content== The film's first segment examines the industrial production of meat (chicken, beef, and pork), calling it inhumane and economically and environmentally unsustainable.[2][5] The second segment looks at the industrial production of grains and vegetables (primarily corn and soy beans), again labeling this economically and environmentally unsustainable.[2][5] The film's third and final segment is about the economic and legal power of the major food companies, such as food libel laws, whose livelihoods are based on supplying cheap but contaminated food, the heavy use of Petroleum-Based chemicals (largely pesticides and fertilizers), and the promotion of unhealthy food consumption habits by the American public.[2][5]

Corn

The film has a segment called A Cornucopia of Choices where it does a decent job talking about how the U.S. Industrial Food System has exploited corn. To summarize the main point, it states how corn has taken over the world/food industry. Walking down the aisle of your supermarket it may seem like there is a variety of choices; but in reality it is just, "clever rearrangements of corn" Micahel Pollan (Food Inc.). It explains how corn has become an easy plant to grow, so we encourage farmers to grow corn and now we have various uses for it: High-Fructose Corn Syrup, Maltodextrin, Dy-Glycerides, Xanthan gum, Ascorbic Acid, Gluten, Cellulose, Startch, Sucrose, Sorbital, food for animals, etc. Corn has become the wonder plant used in most of our food. .[6][5]

Interviewees

Eric Schlosser, Richard Lobb, Vince Edwards, Carole Morison, Michael Pollan, Troy Rousch, Larry Johnson, Allen Trenkle, Patricia Buck, Barbara Kowalyck, Diana DeGette, Phil English, Eldon Roth, Rosa Soto, Joel Salatin, Eduardo Peña, Gary Hirshberg, Moe Parr, David Runyon, Stephen R. Pennell and William P. Kealey.

Production

Michael Pollan Was a consultant and appears in the film, Eric Schlosser co-produced and appears in the film, and Participant Media (which also produced Al Gore's 2006 documentary, An Inconvenient Truth) was the production company.[2] The film took three years to make.[7][8] Director Kenner claims that he spent large amounts of his budget on legal fees to try to protect himself against lawsuits from industrial food producers, pesticide and fertilizer manufacturers, and other companies criticized in the film.[7]

An extensive marketing campaign was undertaken to promote the film. A companion book of the same name was released in May 2009.[4][9][10] Stonyfield Farm, an organic yogurt maker located in New Hampshire, promoted the film printing information about it on the foil lids of 10 million cups of its yogurt in June 2009.[11][12]

Releases and box office

The film was shown as a "sneak-peek" at the True/False Film Festival in Columbia, Missouri, in February 2009.[13] It also screened at several film festivals in the spring before opening commercially in the United States on June 12, 2009, in New York City, Los Angeles, and San Francisco.[5][14] It made $61,400 in its first week.[15] It expanded to an additional 51 theaters in large cities in the U.S. and Canada on June 19.[5][10][14][16][17] It made an additional $280,000 its second weekend.[16]

The film was due to be released in the United Kingdom in the summer of 2009.[18] However, its release was postponed until 12 February 2010.[19]

Response

The producers invited on-screen rebuttals from Monsanto Company, Tyson Foods, Smithfield Foods, Perdue Farms, and other companies, but all declined the invitation.[14][20][21] Monsanto says it invited the filmmakers to a producers' trade show,[22] but they claimed that they were denied press credentials at the event, and were not permitted to attend.[23] An alliance of food production companies (led by the American Meat Institute) created a website, SafeFoodInc.org,[24] in response to the claims made in the film.[5][10][20][25] Monsanto also established its own website to specifically respond to the film's claims about that company's products and actions.[2][21][26] Cargill told the Minneapolis Star Tribune that the company welcomed "differing viewpoints on how global agriculture can affordably nourish the world while minimizing environmental impact, ensuring food safety, guaranteeing food accessibility and providing meaningful work in agricultural communities."[27] But the company criticized the film's "'one-size-fits-all' answers to a task as complex as nourishing 6 billion people who are so disparately situated across the world."[27]

Fast-food chain Chipotle responded to the documentary in July 2009 by offering free screenings of it at various locations nationwide and stating that it does things differently, which it hopes customers will appreciate after seeing Food, Inc.[28]

The film's director, Robert Kenner, has denied attacking the current system of producing food, noting in one interview: "All we want is transparency and a good conversation about these things."[29] In the same interview, he went on to say, "...the whole system is made possible by government subsidies to a few huge crops like corn. It's a form of socialism that's making us sick."[29]

Critical reception

The film has been highly rated by critics collectively, with a combined rating of 96% on Rotten Tomatoes,[30] and 80/100 on Metacritic.[31] The Staten Island Advance called the documentary "excellent" and "sobering," concluding, "Documentaries work when they illuminate, when they alter how we think, which renders Food, Inc. a solid success, and a must-see."[32] The Toronto Sun called it "terrifying" and "frankly riveting".[17] The San Francisco Examiner was equally positive, calling the film "visually stylish" and "One of the year’s most important films..."[33] The paper called the picture's approach to its controversial subject matter "a dispassionate appeal to common sense" and applauded its "painstaking research and thoughtful, evenhanded commentary..."[33] The Los Angeles Times, too, praised Food, Inc.'s cinematography, and called the film "eloquent" and "essential viewing".[34] The Montreal Gazette noted that despite the film's focus on American food manufacture, the film is worth viewing by anyone living in a country where large-scale food production occurs.[4] The paper's reviewer declared Food, Inc. "must-see", but also cautioned that some of the scenes are " not for the faint of heart."[4] The St. Louis Post-Dispatch noted that other documentaries and books have examined similar issues before. However, the film was still worth seeing: "The food-conglomerate angle was covered in a less-ambitious documentary called King Corn, and a more-ambitious documentary called The Corporation touched on the menace of the multinationals; but this one hits the sweet spot, and it does it with style."[35] The review concluded that the most powerful portion of the film focused on Monsanto's pursuit of legal action against farmers accused of improperly saving and reselling or replanting Monsanto’s patented seed, in violation of a signed stewardship agreement and contract not to save and resell or replant seeds produced from the crops they grow from Monsanto seed.[26][35]

The San Francisco Chronicle, while noting the film has a "flair for the dramatic," concluded: "...it throws out one zinger after another, making its case with the methodical and unremitting force of muckrakers trying to radicalize—or at least rouse—a dozing populace."[3] Other reviews have not been as positive. A commentator at Forbes magazine found the film compelling but incomplete. The picture, the reviewer found, "fails to address how we might feed the country—or world" on the sustainable agriculture model advocated by the filmmakers, and that it failed to address critical issues of cost and access.[22] The Washington Times said the movie was "hamstrung" because few corporate executives wished to be interviewed by the documentarians, although it agreed that the film was trying to aim for balance.[36]

Awards

The film tied for fourth place as best documentary at the 35th Seattle International Film Festival.[37]

The film was nominated for best documentary in the 82nd Academy Awards,[38] but lost to The Cove.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Food, Inc." BoxOfficeMojo.com. February 27, 2010. Accessed 2009-02-27.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Severson, Kim. "Eat, Drink, Think, Change." The New York Times. June 3, 2009.
  3. ^ a b Biancolli, Amy. "Review: 'Food, Inc.' Not for the Squeamish." San Francisco Chronicle. June 12, 2009.
  4. ^ a b c d Chesterman, Lesley. "A Film That Will Make You Think Before You Eat." Montreal Gazette. June 20, 2009.
  5. ^ a b c d e f g "New Film Offers Troubling View of US Food Industry." Associated Press. June 7, 2009.
  6. ^ Cite error: The named reference Food Inc. was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  7. ^ a b Simmons, Krista. "What Really Goes Into the Bag: Behind the Movie 'Food, Inc.'." Los Angeles Times. June 7, 2009.
  8. ^ There is some dispute as to how long the film was in production. In another interview, director Robert Kenner claims the film took six years to make. See: Math, Mara. "The Right to Know About What We Eat." San Francisco Examiner. June 11, 2009.
  9. ^ Food Inc.: A Participant Guide: How Industrial Food Is Making Us Sicker, Fatter, and Poorer—And What You Can Do About It. Karl Weber, ed. New York: PublicAffairs, 2009. ISBN 1586486942
  10. ^ a b c Levine, Allen. "Little Ag vs. Big Ag? Best Bet On Both." St. Paul Pioneer Press. June 18, 2009.
  11. ^ "'Food, Inc.' Gets Promo on Yogurt Lids." The Hollywood Reporter. June 11, 2009.
  12. ^ Marrero, Diana. "Sensenbrenner Cow Tax Fears Come Out of Thin Air." Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. June 13, 2009.
  13. ^ "Food, Inc." True/False Film Festival. No date. Accessed 2009-07-31. [dead link]
  14. ^ a b c Deardorff, Julie. "Food, Inc.: How Factory Farming Affects You." Chicago Tribune. June 12, 2009.
  15. ^ "Good Buzz Wins Out As 'Hangover,' 'Up' Dominate Box Office Once Again." Los Angeles Times. June 14, 2009; Germain, David. "'Hangover' Hangs On As No. 1 Movie With $33.4M." Associated Press. June 14, 2009.
  16. ^ a b Kilday, Gregg. "'Proposal' Accepted at the Box Office." The Hollywood Reporter. June 21, 2009.
  17. ^ a b Braun, Liz. "You'll Choke On This Info." Toronto Sun. June 19, 2009.
  18. ^ Rayner, Jay. "Food Is the New Fur for the Celebrity With a Conscience." The Observer. June 14, 2009.
  19. ^ "UK Film release schedule - past, present and future". www.launchingfilms.com. 2009. Retrieved 2009-11-10.
  20. ^ a b Kearney, Christine. "Film Aims to Expose Dangers in U.S. Food Industry." Reuters. June 9, 2009.
  21. ^ a b Gustin, Georgina. "'Food, Inc.' Chews Up Monsanto, Agribusiness Cousins." St. Louis Post-Dispatch. June 26, 2009.
  22. ^ a b Ruiz, Rebecca. "What Food Activists Ignore." Forbes. June 11, 2009.
  23. ^ The trade show operators said they did not maintain records on rejected requests for press credentials. See: Gustin, "'Food, Inc.' Chews Up Monsanto, Agribusiness Cousins," St. Louis Post-Dispatch, June 26, 2009.
  24. ^ SafeFoodInc.org Web site. Accessed 2009-06-07.
  25. ^ "Web Site Takes on 'Food Inc'." Pork Magazine. June 12, 2009; Levin, Ann. "'Food Inc.' Has Sickening View of Food Industry." Associated Press. June 21, 2009.
  26. ^ a b Monsanto site about the movie Food, Inc. Accessed 2009-06-07.
  27. ^ a b "Cargill's Response to 'Food Inc.'." Minneapolis Star Tribune. June 20, 2009.
  28. ^ "Free Food – Food, Inc., That Is". Zagat.com. July 9, 2009.
  29. ^ a b Birdsall, John. "A Conversation with 'Food, Inc.' Director Robert Kenner." San Francisco Weekly. June 12, 2009.
  30. ^ "Food, Inc. (2009)" RottenTomatoes.com Accessed 2010-11-30.
  31. ^ "Food, Inc." Metacritic.com No date. Accessed 2009-11-19.
  32. ^ Hill, Todd. "'Food, Inc.,' 'Moon' Top This Week's Alternatives to Mainstream Movies." Staten Island Advance. June 12, 2009.
  33. ^ a b Drake, Rossiter. "Here's Why Food Is Factory Fresh." San Francisco Examiner. June 12, 2009.
  34. ^ Goldstein, Gary. "Movie Review: 'Food, Inc.'" Los Angeles Times. June 12, 2009.
  35. ^ a b Williams, Joe. "'Food, Inc.'" St. Louis Post-Dispatch. June 26, 2009.
  36. ^ Bunch, Sonny. "Moore Worry Haunts Cinema." The Washington Times. June 19, 2009.
  37. ^ Kilday, Gregg. "Seattle Fest Announces Winners." The Hollywood Reporter. June 14, 2009.
  38. ^ http://www.google.com/hostednews/canadianpress/article/ALeqM5jRVI5z29NpqyM5-jQIAj8RZGJvpQ
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Food,_Inc.&oldid=400814648"