Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Requests for permissions

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Skier Dude (talk | contribs) at 06:19, 11 December 2010 (→User:Michaeldsuarez: done). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback (add request)

Shortcuts


User:Mr. Berty

I have been reverting vandalism for more than a week now, using WP:LUPIN mixed with Twinkle and I think I can handle the controls of huggle now. Mr. Berty talk/stalk 16:10, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  Wifione ....... Leave a message 11:05, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A quick check shows that this account is a sockpuppet. Ng.j (talk) 10:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed and already blocked. Wifione ....... Leave a message 13:43, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Beakerboy

I've been editing and reverting vandalism for 6 years. New tools are always helpful. Beakerboy (talk) 17:38, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:45, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Altruism

A Reviewer & an Anti-vandalism fighter for many years now. Convenience of this right would considerably increase my efficiency. Thank you. AltruismT a l k - Contris. 19:54, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Nakon 20:07, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ute in DC

I have a consistent history of undoing vandalism and I would like to have access to the ease of the rollback feature. —Ute in DC (talk) 21:13, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 21:43, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Half price

I revert vandalism more often than I would like. I understand WP guidelines and I can be trusted not to misuse the right. Thanks. —Half Price 16:30, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:41, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:ThiagoRuiz

I would like a faster tool to revert vandalism because, although I'm not very very active here, I'm an administrator on pt.wikipedia (I'm experienced with rollback there), so I always enter here and have opportunities to fight against vandalism. Besides, I'd like to use Huggle here too, so that I can do a better job. Thanks. ThiagoRuiz (talk) 23:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Admin on another WMF wiki is good enough for me. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:02, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Knightwhosayni

Obvious vandalism going on recently, perhaps rollback to at least as early as 23:54, 15 September 2010? I tried one undo only to find out I can't do multiple undos. Knightwhosayni (talk) 23:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done This page is for requesting the permission itself, not for requesting its use, but it seems someone else ahs taken care of that. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:00, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Verkhovensky

To paraphrase Justice Potter Stewart: "Vandalism? I know it when I see it." I think rollback would be a useful tool that would enhance my editing. Verkhovensky (talk) 03:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm a bit concerned that you haven't warned the editors that you've reverted, per the messages at WP:UWT. Nakon 03:54, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that I was pretty consistent with warnings as I use Twinkle and by my earlier manual reversions. I apologize for any oversights. Verkhovensky (talk) 05:20, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nakon, do you think that Verkhovensky should not have rollback for this reason? Malinaccier (talk) 22:24, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No,  Done Nakon 22:35, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I promise to be a worthy steward of this tool! Verkhovensky (talk) 22:39, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:CharlieEchoTango

Frequently fight vandalism and sometimes have technical issues with TW. Cheers «CharlieEchoTango» 05:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Malinaccier (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - «CharlieEchoTango» 19:17, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Burhan Ahmed

I have a complete understand of WP:BLP, WP:Verifiability and WP:Notability and all other Wikipedia policies use to edit it, I have been editing and fighting vandalism on Wikipedia since 4 years. I think that I am trustworthy enough to be given access to this tool. BurhanAhmed (talk • contribs) 15:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:05, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Darth Stabro

I am a recent pages patroller as well as a new pages patroller, and I think this would be useful. Thanks! ~Darth Starbo 17:35, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:38, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Lwalt

Consistent history of reviewing, editing, and removing content considered vandalism from articles to embrace neutral content →Lwalt ♦ talk 12:00, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Malinaccier (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:MartinezMD

I have about 2500 total edits now. While undoing works, rollback would make the job easier, especially if there have been several interspaced bad edits or vandalism. I don't anticipate frequent use of a rollback, but it would still be helpful when needed. MartinezMD (talk) 02:31, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Dan6hell66

The rollback has the tools necessary to undo the vandalism quickly, and definitely the WikiProjects in which I support (discographies,albums,songs,films, and others), need very quickly to undo vandalism and show what Wikipedia is not. It is a great help to the revision of articles and others. D6h What's on your mind? 04:20, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ending-start

I've been reverting vandalism for a while now, and this tool can sure make it a lot easier. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT 17:45, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:TucsonDavid

I have been using stiki for a bit and I believe I'm ready for this responsibility now. TucsonDavid (talk) 06:14, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 15:19, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Ending-start

I know I just requested for this yesterday, but I made a few mistakes while using it, and got it taken away. I guess you can say I got a little too excited about it. I was using Huggle, which is the main place of my mistakes, which I will not be using anymore, as it's a bit too much for me to handle. But I can assure you that I now 100% fully understand what the rollback is for, and will not revert with it unless it's an very obvious vandalism, and not just incorrect edits. ΣПDiПG–STΛЯT 15:28, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - It was specifically removed for edit-warring, not Huggle use. You already raised this with the admin that removed the tool (User_talk:Mkativerata#Re), and he suggested you make a good number of reverts using other methods, such as Twinkle, to demonstrate that you are in fact comfortable with what rollback-worthy vandalism is. I'd agree with that - fight vandalism without rollback for a little while, and ask Mkativerata again. I'm sure he'll be happy to restore it once you've adequately demonstrated you've learned from the mistakes you made. ~ mazca talk 15:39, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Krashlandon

I have been an established editor for four years (though not active for a while), and have participated frequently in anti-vandalism efforts. I have been using popups for a while, but I would like to try Huggle. Krashlandon (talk) 17:10, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done by HJ Mitchell, apparently. —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 18:26, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Korruski

Fairly frequent vandal-fighter, and can't use TW on my work laptop. KorruskiTalk 17:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Malinaccier (talk) 18:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Perseus, Son of Zeus

I've reverted a great amount of vandalism. Because I often use Google Chrome, the "edit form" for doesn't pop up. However, I also use a MacBook. Please grant me rollback rights. Thank you. Perseus (t • c) 21:06, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:37, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I requested my rollback to be removed. Perseus (t • c) 16:32, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fakewcfrog

I'd like to start doing some community service for Wikipedia. After all, it is an important public place. Fakewcfrog (talk) 22:32, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As useful as your past contributions may appear to be, you seem to have little to no experience with vandalism fighting. I suggest you try it out using undo or Twinkle before getting this more advanced tool, but in the meanwhile wait for this to be closed by an actual admin. — Waterfox ~talk~ 22:46, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I'm afraid I agree with Waterfox on this. More experience of vandal fighting and of Wikipedia in general would be beneficial. We appreciate all you've done so far and keep it up, but I don't think you're quite ready for rollback just yet. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:39, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Racconish

Maintaining fashion related pages, particularly List of fashion designers.   Racconish Tk 09:07, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done —  Tivedshambo  (t/c) 16:54, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Michaeldsuarez

I've recently been entrusted with reviewer rights, and I believe that rollback rights would aid in my tasks on Wikipedia. Click here if you wish to view my reviewer rights requested. Twinkle shows down my browser with JavaScript unfortunately. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 21:43, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Skier Dude (talk 06:19, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Rollback&oldid=401737001"