User talk:Zxoxm

Crime against humanity

Okay, we get that you are upset about water fluoridation, but you will get yourself blocked from Wikipedia if you make absurd claims such that the practice is a crime against humanity, as you just did. Your edit is stupid, not even controversial. The CDC in the U.S. calls water fluoridation one of the top 10 health achievements of the 20th century. One might not agree with the CDC's evaluation or with the technology, but to suggest that this practice is a "crime against humanity" calls into question your ability to discuss matters sensibly. Of course, Wikipedia might be part of the conspiracy in which case I am still waiting for my check for my participation. Your edits were way beyond silly, farsical, or helpful in any way. --Smokefoot (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dean Burk, who discovered photosynthesis with Otto Heinrich Warburg, said that "fluoridation is a form of public mass murder" http://vlex.com/vid/john-yiamouyiannis-consumers-union-36956980#ixzz17sg3IYg3 http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/1931/warburg.html (Zxoxm (talk) 19:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC))[reply]

http://openjurist.org/619/f2d/932/yiamouyiannis-v-consumers-union-of-united-states-inc#fn3

August 13, 2007: CDC faces ethics charges for failure to warn the public on fluoride's risks http://www.fluoridealert.org/ethics.html

Press Release from the Lille Center, Inc. http://www.fluoridealert.org/ethics.release.aug.13.2007.html

The CDC Ethics Complaint http://www.fluoridealert.org/cdc.ethics.complaint.aug.13.2007.pdf

ADA Cements Its Influence on CDC Fluoride Policy http://iaomt.com/news/archive.asp?intReleaseID=310&month=9&year=2009

Georgia Water Worker Fired For Refusing to Fluoridate http://iaomt.com/news/archive.asp?intReleaseID=288&month=12&year=2008

US EPA Union letter (pdf) to the Commissioners of the Water Utility http://fluoridealert.org/dalton.epa.letter.2008.pdf

http://www.fluoridealert.org/ http://iaomt.com/news/archive.asp?view=all

Suggestion: you might want to put these (or other) statements about yourself or your interests/philosophy on your main user page User:Zxoxm. Most registered editors do something like that. No one else is supposed to edit your personal user page. --Smokefoot (talk) 19:47, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Ckatz^chat_spy 05:26, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion (User:GeneralMandrakeRipper). If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gwen Gale (talk) 21:06, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Zxoxm (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How has Zxoxm done Block evasion? GeneralMandrakeRipper's account is not Zxoxm's account and was blocked. I do not know what the User:Freedom5000 user is or how that account is involved here. The Zxoxm account has been updating and creating Wikipedia articles that improve the site. What violations has Zxoxm done to be blocked? Zxoxm (talk) 21:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=How has Zxoxm done Block evasion? GeneralMandrakeRipper's account is not Zxoxm's account and was blocked. I do not know what the User:Freedom5000 user is or how that account is involved here. The Zxoxm account has been updating and creating Wikipedia articles that improve the site. What violations has   Zxoxm done to be blocked?    [[User:Zxoxm|Zxoxm]] ([[User talk:Zxoxm#top|talk]]) 21:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=How has Zxoxm done Block evasion? GeneralMandrakeRipper's account is not Zxoxm's account and was blocked. I do not know what the User:Freedom5000 user is or how that account is involved here. The Zxoxm account has been updating and creating Wikipedia articles that improve the site. What violations has   Zxoxm done to be blocked?    [[User:Zxoxm|Zxoxm]] ([[User talk:Zxoxm#top|talk]]) 21:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=How has Zxoxm done Block evasion? GeneralMandrakeRipper's account is not Zxoxm's account and was blocked. I do not know what the User:Freedom5000 user is or how that account is involved here. The Zxoxm account has been updating and creating Wikipedia articles that improve the site. What violations has   Zxoxm done to be blocked?    [[User:Zxoxm|Zxoxm]] ([[User talk:Zxoxm#top|talk]]) 21:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}