User talk:MUCHERS22

FYI

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:MUCHERS22 reported by User:Brewcrewer (Result: ) --brew crewer (yada, yada) 23:21, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for constant and seemingly habitual edit warring. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:05, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey Im sorry for the reverting, I tried to reach out to the person who kept deleting my adds without fair reason but I never got anything back from him. But like I said Im sorry for breaching the rules and it wont happen again, I will use the discussion page in such conflicts, if I get unblocked. I find the block unecessarry since I was just ignorant enough not to pay attention to the warning I got (from another editor) !. MUCHERS22 (talk) 10:35, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have six prior blocks for edit-warring. Because you did not stop edit-warring after these six blocks, I do not believe you that you will stop if this seventh block is lifted. Sandstein 11:28, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well like I said I am truly sorry for what I did and that I didnt pay enough attention, I tried to reach out to the editor too but he ignored my call, what should I have done i such a position? The people deleting my stuff did it just out of spite and no reason, just look for yourself which reason they used. Yes I have been blocked before but I have finally learned my lesson, it took 6 times, for some it may just take 1. If there isnt a single way for me to get back, please remove my user then. MUCHERS22 (talk) 12:03, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Decline reason:

6 blocks for the same reason shows me that you're not able to learn. That said, WP:OFFER exists - in order to make use of this, I recommend you go to a different Wikimedia project and start editing properly. When you return in June, show us that you now understand the policies. As you already should know, your userid can never be deleted. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:42, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Again for the third time, let me know how I should have handle the conclict that ended up in six mounth ban? I reached out to the user who kept deleting my stuff (which was also without fair reason), but he ignored it. What should I have done? Please tell me because I am probably going to go in to that trap over and over, and you can see my earlier discussions on the Admin message board, I was never given a fair reason on the earlier blocks neither. No wonder I do the same misstakes. Giving me a ban for six mounths without telling me the reason is vulgar, I guess you rather find my political views contradicting with yours, just like the previous ban. Also like I said, some learn after 1 time someone learn after 10 times, thats relative. But hey, sure ban me 6 mounth or 6 years, why would I care? In such case I will only use another IP and I will be back with another username. Problem solved. MUCHERS22 (talk) 15:18, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Stop being disingenuous. You were repeatedly warned; anyone can look at the history of this page and see just how many times you received warnings and simply blanked them, neither responding to them nor modifying your behavior. If you come back under another username, and continue the same behavior, the exact same result will ensue; it has nothing whatsoever to do with the content of your edits - just your flawed approach to editing Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:33, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

t

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MUCHERS22 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yes I have been warned I havent concured on that, what I havent been is..been told for what rule breaking (that ended up in a 6 mounth ban) you have also failed to tell me how I should have done when 1. I stopped reverting and approached the user 2. He ignored my call. How could I be punished for that action? MUCHERS22 (talk) 15:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Yes I have been warned I havent concured on that, what I havent been is..been told for what rule breaking (that ended up in a 6 mounth ban) you have also failed to tell me how I should have done when 1. I stopped reverting and approached the user 2. He ignored my call. How could I be punished for that action?  [[User:MUCHERS22|MUCHERS22]] ([[User talk:MUCHERS22#top|talk]]) 15:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yes I have been warned I havent concured on that, what I havent been is..been told for what rule breaking (that ended up in a 6 mounth ban) you have also failed to tell me how I should have done when 1. I stopped reverting and approached the user 2. He ignored my call. How could I be punished for that action?  [[User:MUCHERS22|MUCHERS22]] ([[User talk:MUCHERS22#top|talk]]) 15:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Yes I have been warned I havent concured on that, what I havent been is..been told for what rule breaking (that ended up in a 6 mounth ban) you have also failed to tell me how I should have done when 1. I stopped reverting and approached the user 2. He ignored my call. How could I be punished for that action?  [[User:MUCHERS22|MUCHERS22]] ([[User talk:MUCHERS22#top|talk]]) 15:37, 17 December 2010 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}