Talk:Baby Jesus theft

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Baby Jesus theft article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Baby Jesus theft has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 28, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
May 27, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Good article

Holidays: Christmas GA‑class Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Holidays, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of holidays on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HolidaysWikipedia:WikiProject HolidaysTemplate:WikiProject HolidaysHolidays articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Christmas task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Christianity: Christmas GA‑class Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Christmas task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Really?

Why does this even have an article? A few minor crimes that occur in locations in the US hardly merits an article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.111.118.93 (talk) 01:08, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You guys....

What is up with this article?? This is ridiculous. Please delete this joke of an article before any serious anti-wikipedia entity finds out about this. Seriously.

Sincerely, some dude

Ridiculously USA-centric

Are the authors of this post even aware of how US-centric the tone and content of this post is? It's described as if it's some kind of global phenomenon, but not only are all the incidents listed from the US, the assumptions here are ridiculous. If it was a global phenomenon, would there really be enough owners of outdoor manger scenes who have the money, satellite access, and regular electricity to power lighting for an outdoor manger scene, let alone these apparently very prevalent GPS tracking systems and surveillance cameras this article implies have been deployed everywhere? This is so frustrating for me it's ridiculous, given that it's such an absurd topic anyway. Somewildthingsgo (talk) 01:03, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incidents which have received significant coverage

Google News search yields some good stuff. The first item which comes up is a story from USA Today about a 70-year-old grandmother who was the culprit in one such case. PSWG1920 (talk) 07:22, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is this really noteworthy?

While likely an annoying phenomenon if your Jesus figurine has dollar and/or spiritual value to you... does this really deserve a Wikipedia article? People steal stop signs too, which is much more dangerous, but does not have its own Wikipedia article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.49.19.120 (talk) 13:34, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Street sign theft--Banana (talk) 04:56, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Baby Jesus theft has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria.

Rly? Are you kidding me? This sad excuse of an article is listed as a good article? If this certifies for a listing, the criteria for good articles need a serious revision -- 85.179.59.93 (talk) 02:56, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Noteworthy?

I am usually an inclusionist, but this is a little ridiculous. If we made an article for everything that was stolen we wouldn't have time to work on anything else. Lauren^whisper 01:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consider a merge?

I know a lot of people are considering that this article should be deleted, but as far as the Christian movement goes, I know of a few who were greatly affected by it religiously. Is there a way that instead of this being deleted, could it possibly be merged with another article just as a small mention that pertains to that subject? CHRISTismyROCK83 (talk) 01:38, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]