User talk:12.210.1.200

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --fvw* 04:08, 7 October 2005 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Robert McClenon 21:47, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

December 2005

Regarding the page Jesse Jackson: This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Nlu 22:48, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- xaosflux ^T/_C 04:52, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Regarding the page Al Sharpton: This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- xaosflux ^T/_C 05:03, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! -- xaosflux ^T/_C 05:06, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 05:07, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

This is unfair. You kept deleting my edits, and I spoke out. I should not be blocked.

Your "edits" consist only of vituperatives and blanking of articles related to African-Americans. That is considered vandalism. You may want to read Wikipedia:Vandalism ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 05:14, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

If you truly would like to be unblocked, consider not writing things like "RESPOND TO MY REQUEST PUSSIES" on your talk page. This will probably hinder, instead of help, the process. Also, please only add the {{unblock}} tag once. Thanks. --PeruvianLlama^(spit) 05:12, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

What's With Al Sharpton?

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.--Master Jay 04:37, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Strike 2

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Master Jay 04:38, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

{{unblock}} I did not think that using a synonym would be considered vandalism.

Do you actually think anyone believes you? Next time I see racist vandalism from this IP, it'll be blocked from editing Wikipedia permanently. FCYTravis 04:42, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

{{unblock}} I am not racist. I merely used a synonym. I didn't intend to offend anyone. I feel I am being treated unfairly.

{{unblock}} Could someone please respond to my request?

Request denied. The only reason why your IP is not permanently blocked is because IPs, even so-called "static IPs," can get reassigned. --Nlu (talk) 05:54, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. The block is for a period of 1 week. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. You asked to be banned. Since that is against the policy of not permanently blocking IP addresses, I'm going to give you that time to rethink our position further. --Nlu (talk) 06:35, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

1 week ban

You have been banned for 1 week, given your past history and this edit of the Stanley Williams talk page. Enjoy your break. --Flockmeal 00:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Stop the racial crap that you are posting on Wikipedia. It's not funny.--Holocron 00:40, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for a week, for the reasons documented above. Antandrus (talk) 00:41, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

I feel that a block of this length was unfair without being warned prior to this block.

Here let me quote you, "Dumb Nigga'", "Dumbass Nigga'", "King of Niggers." And you actually ask why your being blocked?--Holocron 00:45, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Your talk page documents that you've been warned many many times. Joyous | Talk 00:46, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

I said was not warned before THIS block.

What do you expect when you go around calling people niggers. I've looked at your edits and I've determined that you are a Republican. As a Republican myself I feel that by you calling people niggers brings shame to Republicans and what they stand for. If you want to call people niggers and make your political party look bad then join the American Nazi Party.--Holocron 02:14, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

Not a Republican you idiot. A rash generalization like the one you made should be considered vandalism to my user talk page.

Well, idiot, then why did you vandalize Democrat pages? What party are you anyway? US Marijuana Party

I am a Democrat, just not a flaming left wing liberal. I am more of the Dixiecrat mold.

I see. What is your proble with Negros.

problem not proble, sorry

Don't have a problem with negros, just a problem with left-wing morons

Indeed, as do I. The edit you made to Ted Kennedy was true. I dont like Sharpton either, but I wouldn't call him a nigger. If you want to express your opinion please do so in the talk pages.--Holocron 02:42, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

I wasn't aware a talk page existed. I apologize for my transgressions and request a less stiff ban.

talk page is what you are on now, it shows up as a discussion tab. I actually am not an addministrator so I can't unblock you that but if you would like me to I can ask an addministrator for you. Type up an explanation as to why you want to be able to edit again and post it here and I'll see what I can do.--Holocron 03:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

I wasn't aware a talk page existed to add opinions. I apologize for my transgressions and request a less stiff ban than the one issued to me. I will happily accept a 24 or 48 hour penalty for my mistakes.

I sent your message to an administrator, he will decide whether or not you are to be blocked. If you get unblocked, please, stop puting your opinions on the main page or you will have a permanent block.--Holocron 20:25, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

I looked through your contributions and found nothing but racist vandalism. You obviously have come here again and again to vandalise, and now you want to be unblocked? Because you weren't warned enough?

Promise never to vandalise again and I'll unblock you. Antandrus (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

I PROMISE TO NEVER VANDALIZE AGAIN.

OK; I'll assume good faith. You're unblocked. Antandrus (talk) 04:34, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

February 2006

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Pikeville College, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. Evil saltine 07:25, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. -- King of Hearts | (talk) 21:49, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

FCYTravis has overstepped his bounds by permanently blocking an IP address. It is against Wikipedia's policy to permanently ban IP addresses, and FCYTravis knows this. FCYTravis should have his privileges as an administrator suspended for violating Wikipedia policy.

You won't get unblocked by attacking users. SWD316 ^{talk to me} 04:04, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

I am not attacking users. I am only addressing the decision by this particular administrator. If I said that FCYTravis is an idiot, that would be attacking. However, I am only discussing an administrative decision, not the user himself.

If you didn't want to be blocked then you should not have vandalized. Please rethink your actions while I talk to FCYTravis. SWD316 ^{talk to me} 04:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

I have contacted FCYTravis for you but it looks like he is currently off-line. I requested a 6 month block instead of an indefinite block, so you might have a chance of returning...one day. SWD316 ^{talk to me} 04:28, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Given that this user has made absolutely nothing but vandalous edits, ever, six months is getting off easy. But six months it is. See you in August, and if you vandalize again after the block expires, this IP will be permanently banned from editing Wikipedia. FCYTravis 09:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for six months. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

FCYTravis 09:22, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

I would like an outside party to decide this case. I feel that FCYTravis has overstepped his bounds as an administrator. One, he went against Wikipedia policy by permanently banning an IP address. Two, he has threatened again to violate Wikipedia policy with a permanent ban of an IP address. My first request is that FCYTravis be reprimanded for his actions and temporarily suspended as an adminstrator. My second request is that a panel of three administrators decide the punishment for me, with FCYTravis not being involved. Thank you!

• As an outside party, I decide that you are an unrepentant troll and vandal, that your punishment is to be crushed by an elephant and that FCYTravis is awarded a cookie. SIVartycf

If you would not vandalize other user's talk pages, it would be appreciated. If I am a troll, you are a worthless piece of crap that has nothing better to do than stick his nose where it doesn't belong. I want 3 administrators, not 1 phony moron to look at this issue.

I wish you good luck in your quest. FCYTravis 05:48, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

I think it is time that someone responded to my request.

Come on man! You promised you'd never vandalize again. You clearly vandalized a couple pages, so don't tell me you didn't vandalize. There is no room for you on wikipedia, hope you aren't unblocked,Holocron 17:43, 14 February 2006 (UTC

{{unblock}}

My requests stated above have still not been addressed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.210.1.200 (talk • contribs)

Yes it has. Your requests for unblock have been denied. I would suggest that you read up on Wikipedia regulations during the time that you're blocked. You're welcome back to edit if you are willing to contribute positively, once the block expires. --Nlu (talk) 04:37, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

You're a liar. I have yet to hear a ruling from a panel of three administrators as requested. You are one administrator, not three. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.210.1.200 (talk • contribs)

I'll get you three admins, and I'll watch with joy as your permanently blocked.--Holocron 15:00, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

---