Talk:Shame (1968 film)

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	War films task force

Film: Nordic / War Stub‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the War films task force.

Sweden Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Skammen.jpg

Image:Skammen.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Synopsis is wrong in many details

I just saw the movie and most of the details are wrong. I'm pretty sure Jacobi is a mayor. The couple do not help tend to the wounded of both sides (Eva tries to tend to one man but he is already dead). The town is not exactly panicking. "rounded up by the invading force" refers to the couple being filmed for propaganda purposes and then later questioned by the other side about this issue. Jacobi releases the couple before he sleeps with Eva - at the very least it isn't certain that him and Eva have an agreement "finally spared" is inaccurate. Jacobi associating with the couple is the problem - they are not constantly sequestered. Eva does not lead the couple to the sea - Jan goes to rendezvous with a fishing boat at the sea and Eva, after initially saying she wouldn't go, decides to follow. Jan pays the fare for the boat out of money Jacobi gave Eva. Jan got the information from a deserter, a boy, that he shot and stole from, it wasn't 'soldiers'.

There are many other inaccuracies. I won't list them all. But the article needs to be substantially rewritten. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.110.243 (talk) 05:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are inaccuracies, and it does need to be rewritten. But Jacobi is a military officer with the rank **överste**, equivalent to a colonel or a lieutenant-colonel. 203.219.29.254 (talk) 02:23, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]