User talk:69.86.233.94

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.86.233.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This user malik shabazz seems to be shadowing my life as she undos almost every edit I do, instantaneously. Sunlight is good for you malik. Now in regards to my being blocked by this mole person, I do not see how my edits were disruptive. In the state of "palestine" article, I changed 'Israeli control' to 'it being the capital of Israel', in the lede section about Jerusalem.69.86.233.94 (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You did a bit more than that, for instance this which came after a final warning. Furthermore, you achieve nothing by complaining about another editor. Please reread WP:NOTTHEM and the other parts of the guide to appealing blocks.

Ok, and how is calling someone who murdered people a "murderer", considered disruptive? 69.86.233.94 (talk) 22:43, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Favonian (talk) 22:30, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Capital of Israel

Perhaps I am being dense, but is not the capital of Israel Tel Aviv? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The capital of Israel is Jerusalem. Check wikipedias article about Israel.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.86.233.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This user malik shabazz seems to have a personal vendetta against me as she undos almost every edit I do, instantaneously, for the past 3 months. Now in regards to my being blocked by this mole person, I do not see how my edits were disruptive. In the state of "palestine" article, I changed 'Israeli control' to 'it being the capital of Israel', in the lede section about Jerusalem and in the samir kuntar article, I changed the superfluous "former member of plo" to "murderer". I don't see how calling someone who murdered people and children a murderer can be deemed disruptive or vandalism. 69.86.233.94 (talk) 22:46, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I've reviewed some of your recent edits, and it appears that you are only interested in contributing a political point of view to Wikipedia. Since Wikipedia requires that all edits be neutral, that isn't content we need, so the block will help Wikipedia to meet its goals. If you are truly interested in helping Wikipedia, and not just in trying to further your own ideas, you might consider, when your block expires in March, avoiding the topics of Israel and Palestine entirely, and instead writing about subjects that you don't have such passionate opinions about. Cheese, for instance, or Classical music.

I don't have a plan for editing differently, because I will not be. What are you my parent? Why would I plan on NOT stating facts as I have been? Are you suggesting I make comments that are untrue? Because I don't believe an administrator should be suggesting that contributors state lies rather than truth. Clearly you're not understanding my very simple qualm, could you connect me to a competent administrator please? 69.86.233.94 (talk) 23:54, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:23, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes thank you for your relevant suggestions about cheese. However it is not up to you or wikipedia to determine whether or not I have an agenda. Obviously I contribute to topics of which I am knowledgeable and that would be Israel. My comments were in no way biased or serving my own interests. My edits were also not "points of view" as you claim, but empirical facts. If you are truly interested in making false assumptions perhaps you should consider liberalism.

It may not have been your intention, but you made this comment and signed it with my name. I did not make this comment, nor would I; I am able to determine, by reading words, whether or not they meet Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Indeed, it would be rather strange if I could not. I would not ever claim that such a simple reading skill was impossible. Please, be careful not to sign my name to your words.-FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:31, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to wiki so I don't really know the technicalities of it. It seems you are not able to determine, by reading words, whether or not comments meet wikipedias neutral standard. It seems also you can simply not read, because, as aforementioned, my edits were FACT not OPINION. Jerusalem IS the capital of Israel and samir kuntar DID murder people and IS therefore a MURDERER. It is rather strange indeed that you do not possess these simple reading skills. 69.86.233.94 (talk) 23:37, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. But not helpful in showing that you have a good plan for editing differently than you have been. I'm sorry that I wasn't able to communicate clearly about the neutral point of view policy; I'll let you read it for yourself, instead. I wish you the best of luck. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:39, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a plan for editing differently, because I will not be. What are you my parent? Why would I plan on NOT stating facts as I have been? Are you suggesting I make comments that are untrue? Because I don't believe an administrator should be suggesting that contributors state lies rather than truth. Clearly you're not understanding my very simple qualm, could you connect me to a competent administrator please? 69.86.233.94 (talk) 23:47, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.86.233.94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This user malik shabazz seems to be shadowing my life as she undos almost every edit I do, instantaneously. Now in regards to my being blocked by this mole person, I do not see how my edits were disruptive or vandalism. In the state of "palestine" article, I changed 'Israeli control' to 'it being the capital of Israel', in the lede section about Jerusalem and in the samir kuntar article I changed the superfluous "former member of plo" to "murderer". My edits were not my opinion, they were fact: Jerusalem is the capital of Israel and samir kutar killed a 5 year old girl and her family- effectively murdering them. 69.86.233.94 (talk) 23:33, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The purpose of this community is to build and maintain a neutral encyclopaedia. Your edits are making that more difficult for the rest of us. Also, I am hereby notifying you of WP:ARBPIA#Discretionary sanctions (see below). Also, be aware that further unblock requests that don't address the reason for your block will result in the loss of your ability to edit your talk page. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:53, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As a result of an arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee has acknowledged long-term and persistent problems in the editing of articles related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, broadly understood. As a result, the Committee has enacted broad editing restrictions, described here and below.

Any uninvolved administrator may, on his or her own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working in the area of conflict if, despite being warned, that editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
The sanctions imposed may include blocks of up to one year in length; bans from editing any page or set of pages within the area of conflict; bans on any editing related to the topic or its closely related topics; restrictions on reverts or other specified behaviors; or any other measures which the imposing administrator believes are reasonably necessary to ensure the smooth functioning of the project.
Prior to any sanctions being imposed, the editor in question shall be given a warning with a link to this decision; and, where appropriate, should be counseled on specific steps that he or she can take to improve his or her editing in accordance with relevant policies and guidelines.
Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the appropriate administrators' noticeboard (currently WP:AE), or the Committee.

These editing restrictions may be applied to any editor for cause, provided the editor has been previously informed of the case. This message is to so inform you. This message does not necessarily mean that your current editing has been deemed a problem; this is a template message crafted to make it easier to notify any user who has edited the topic of the existence of these sanctions.

Generally, the next step, if an administrator feels your conduct on pages in this topic area is disruptive, would be a warning, to be followed by the imposition of sanctions (although in cases of serious disruption, the warning may be omitted). Hopefully no such action will be necessary.

This notice is only effective if given by an uninvolved administrator and logged here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:53, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.