User talk:Heymid
This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Heymid. |
![]() | This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
Archives
|
Sorted by month number 2010: 01|03|04|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12 2011: 01|03|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12 2012: 01|03|04|05|09 2013: 02|04|05|06|07|08|10|11|12 2014: 03|05|06|07|08|09|10|11|12 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to message me below! You can do it by clicking here. When you post, please assume good faith, be polite, avoid personal attacks, and be welcoming. It's important that you sign all your messages here using four tildes (~~~~), or else the archiver bot will not be able to archive them later.
My archives can be found here or by expanding the archive box at the right side of this page.
After-block
Hi, I just closed these and dropped them in the holding cell. If you want to take a shot at merging them, that would be great. Otherwise, I will try to get to it later. It might be easier to just make them subtemplates, but I didn't look at it that closely. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:38, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Regarding your edit at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracey Walker
I've reverted your strikeout of a !vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracey Walker. Please do not strike out other people's !votes. If you believe a contributor is a SPA, feel free to add {{subst:spa|username|UTC timestamp [optional]}} to the end of their comment. -- RoninBK T C 21:45, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- "If you believe a contrubitor is a SPA" – it's a CheckUser confirmed sockpuppet. Clearly an SPA. In other words, no reason to revert the strikeout. Haven't you yet realized that the SPA has been blocked as a CU confirmed sockpuppet? The sockmaster's other sockpuppets' !votes were also reverted by other users. See the SPI case. HeyMid (contribs) 21:49, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Then say what you mean in your edit summary. There is a huge difference between an SPA (someone with very few edits outside the topic) and a confirmed sockpuppet. -- RoninBK T C 21:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)