Talk:Planetary objects proposed in religion, astrology, ufology and pseudoscience

; Archives
	Central Fire/Hercolubus archive; Lilith archive; Nibiru archive; Serpo archive; Tiamat archive; Ummo archive;

This is not the forum for discussing the supposed collision between Nibiru and Earth. To discuss that, please go to Talk:Nibiru collision. Any posts on that topic will be moved to that talk page.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Planetary objects proposed in religion, astrology, ufology and pseudoscience. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Planetary objects proposed in religion, astrology, ufology and pseudoscience at the Reference desk.

Astronomy C‑class Bottom‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology C‑class Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal C‑class Low‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on January 16, 2009. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Absolute Rubbish

This article is absolute rubbish. I don't know why schlock like this even deserves a place in an encyclopaedia. Are we to dedicate an article to every "New Age" doomsday prophecy out there? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.21.91.214 (talk) 07:29, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem is, if this article goes, then all these planets end up in the real hypothetical planet article. Serendi ^podous 07:41, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

real hypothetical planets may have some real basis. This article seems to have been written to legitimise the various doomsday prophets and new-age types. More and more scientists and teachers have to explain that these things are not truths. Let's dum this rubish 82.172.99.137 (talk) 14:54, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Martin[reply]

If this article goes, then all of Sitchin's followers, all the Planet X doomsdayers, all the Mormons, astrologers and downright loonies who believe these planets exist will continuously add these planets to the hypothetical planet article, and there will be little means to prevent them, since "hypothetical" has a meaning outside of science. I tried it the other way, and this is the only way that works. Serendi ^podous 15:04, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good job too. I agree, this is the best way to handle the problem. Dougweller (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) Serendi ^podous 15:23, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought this so-called "encyclopedia" was supposed to have a neutral point of view. The first paragraph of this article blows away that idea; as does the doggerel posted above. And what is with the constant use of "conspiracy theorists"? Are you also using the term "conincidence theorists" to put down people who think everything that happens is just a coincidence? No wonder Wikipedia is a laughingstock. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.23.21.81 (talk) 13:04, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So you are saying that the people who believe in Serpo are not conspiracy theorists? Serendi ^podous 16:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Central Fire And Super-massive Black Holes

Reading this section I think it has become clear that this postulate is almost correct. We do rotate around a "central fire" of sorts, a collapsed super sun or super-massive blackhole.

Perhaps Philolaus deserves a place in history as the first to identify such an object and an inclusion in the history of galactic super-massive blackholes?