User talk:Mootros

Greetings! Please post on this page.
你好,中华宾请撰此地英文

Please leave your new message here, including subject/headline, and sign it accordingly.

Hey There

Thought I would swing on by and check on how you are doing and am delighted to see you are doing well and editing daily. After the ANI threads at the beginning, I am glad to see you have stuck around. I do also see that you are editing in some tough areas like articles about German history. That can always be a rough area, so do watch yourself there, that you don't get in trouble. Otherwise, I think you have excelled greatly since my last visit. Good job. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:43, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Good to hear from you. I was thinking about our last conversation awhile ago... :) The German history work is quite difficult, some articles take a rather ahistorical perspective and many contributors are not very interested in changing this. Small steps at the moment, I guess! Again good to hear from you and thanks for your advice. Take care and all the best. Mootros (talk) 13:44, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All the best to you as well. :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 13:55, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Mootros. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Service awards.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lanthanum-138 (talk) 10:16, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read the adjective article. It was called the Kingdom of Germany - at the time; we quote a source at lenght. If you don't stop this, I will ask to have you blocked and the article protected. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:34, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Srnec (talk) 20:29, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And read WP:3RR. You are now at six. You will be blocked if you continue. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:42, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should file an incident report about this blatant vandalism. Mootros (talk) 20:43, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you do, you will be blocked. And serve you right. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:47, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We are dealing with vandalism here, I am afraid. Why should we take this. Mootros (talk) 20:49, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. You are dealing with several informed editors who disagree with you. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:54, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Collective vandalism? Mootros (talk) 20:55, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. WP:Consensus. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:24, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lets file a report than. Mootros (talk) 21:26, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kingdom of Germany. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You might want to cool down a bit. Winner 42 Talk to me! 21:30, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Caution

Regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microregion, it will be good to read WP:BEFORE. AfDs like this not only a waste of the community's time, a violation of Wikipedia guidelines. --Reference Desker (talk) 16:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion on this page?

I noticed your reasoning on some deletion pages and wondered what you thought of this one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephanie_Booth Largely created by one user based and most of the information is sourced from the subjects personal website biography. in correcting legally inpossible statements the creater accused users of vandalism. the biographical data of the wiki creator also happens to be very close to that of the subject of her husband. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.114.190.81 (talk) 00:16, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know about this. I see the problem. However, best to only post a link here, without a specific opinion. Otherwise it can potentially be construed as canvassing. Mootros (talk) 18:32, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks you!

Hi Mootros. My work does not allow me a big contribution to wikipedia, but I hope I can give some big-quality edits to wikipedia. By!--Jonny Bee Goo (talk) 23:44, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

watch out for 3rr

There's a WP:3RR rule that you broke. It's better to revert yourself, and make sure you don't break it again (they will block you). Grey Fox (talk) 00:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]