Jump to content

User talk:Homebirdni

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Homebirdni (talk | contribs) at 12:33, 26 May 2011 (→‎Blocked). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Note on giving warnings

Please do not copy and paste warnings. The arguement that if you should get a warning, another should get a warning doesn't work. I was also not in any breach of 3RR. Finally, you should not change pages without consensus.

I know, I know. But I left wiki for a while because I was fed up with this sort of stuff. The 2 of us were edit-warring and suddenly another user who seems to share the same opinion as you on every topic of debate turns up out of no where to give me a warning...so you can understand why I took the warning to you aswell. It just seems a little suspect and I'm not saying that you are communicating privately but it does seem to be a case that where there is one, another is sure to follow. It doesn't matter. If we could continue the discussion on the issue, that would be great. Do you have a template used for NIR Railway routes? like I said on the Line talk page, the template just asks for 'name' in the infobox and according to NIR, the line is called 'Londonderry Line'. And if the wiki name for the city superseeds this then do we need to change the name of the port aswell as it serves the city, or even the Newspaper 'LondonderrySentinal'. Where does it end?Homebirdni (talk) 16:32, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NorthernCounties is already aware of the 3 revert rule, negating my need to warn him at all. You were apparently not aware of it, meaning there was a need to warn you. O Fenian (talk) 16:44, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, I was aware of 3RR but thanks for your concern. I'm guessing NorthernC has been involved in edit wars before? Anyway, I think myself and NorthernCounties can discuss this out without your help.Homebirdni (talk) 16:52, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Alas, I am indeed human. And just because editors are both active on one topic area doesn't mean that it should be suspicious. I believe Factocop created a sockpuppet case against us which dispelled this once and for all. It wouldn't take someone intelligent whom was removed from the Derry/Londonderry debate to know O Fenian and I have very different contribution and editing habits. Finally, if you want to see other route names, refer to the NIR page or if you feel the need Iarnrod Eireanns. --NorthernCounties (talk) 16:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also, no we won't discuss it by ourselves as Wikipedia is a community project. Not one were just two editors decide the outcome. All who feel the need should contribute. --NorthernCounties (talk) 16:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ok, then discuss. I've left comments on the Line talk page so feel free to follow them up.Homebirdni (talk) 17:02, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Homebirdni. You have new messages at Mo ainm's talk page.
Message added 09:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Homebirdni (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock. What else can I say. Sure, I've come to blows with some other users but surely a disagreement is not enough to exclude me. I am not Factocop. I had previously been accused of being user:Afterlife. All because we seem to be on the same side. I wish to be unblocked unless some substantial evidence can come to light because as yet I have seen none. Only one user has presented evidence and its flimsy at best. Please unblock me as I am not a sock

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I am not a sock. What else can I say. Sure, I've come to blows with some other users but surely a disagreement is not enough to exclude me. I am not Factocop. I had previously been accused of being user:Afterlife. All because we seem to be on the same side. I wish to be unblocked unless some substantial evidence can come to light because as yet I have seen none. Only one user has presented evidence and its flimsy at best. Please unblock me as I am not a sock |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sock. What else can I say. Sure, I've come to blows with some other users but surely a disagreement is not enough to exclude me. I am not Factocop. I had previously been accused of being user:Afterlife. All because we seem to be on the same side. I wish to be unblocked unless some substantial evidence can come to light because as yet I have seen none. Only one user has presented evidence and its flimsy at best. Please unblock me as I am not a sock |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I am not a sock. What else can I say. Sure, I've come to blows with some other users but surely a disagreement is not enough to exclude me. I am not Factocop. I had previously been accused of being user:Afterlife. All because we seem to be on the same side. I wish to be unblocked unless some substantial evidence can come to light because as yet I have seen none. Only one user has presented evidence and its flimsy at best. Please unblock me as I am not a sock |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Also can a check User also be done because here NorthernCounties has also accused anom. IP of being me and/or Factocop all because they disagree with certain users. <<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Derry#Ireland_For_Dummies>>

Also very funny that both NorthernCounties and HighKing contributed to my SPI. Notice how they both sign off with --. oooohhhh. They must be socks of each other. Well certainly that is the sort of evidence being used against me. Homebirdni (talk) 12:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Homebirdni&oldid=431003790"