User talk:SCΛRECROW
D7000 Specs
First of all, and without wasting much more time with YOU DUDES, I would very much like to reiterate that you are an audience of exactly ONE INDIVIDUAL EACH and Wikipedia is not solely for YOU. As well, I would like to reiterate that I would like to see the full specs on there and remind you that neither of YOU are qualified to distinguish what information I, nor the rest of the world, might find "Useful" so long as it is relevant. Does that make sense to you?
This speaks directly to the fact that my post contained ALOT more content than that little box does. And no, it couldn't POSSIBLY be more relevant. THAT WAS KINDA THE POINT DUDE. GET IT? So you call me a spammer? I think you are absolutely ridiculous! That was a HUGE contribution and I feel, a much needed one. "I think that is all we need to know." Shove it; these principles at the very heart of Wikipedia. So whereas I may be relatively new, don't lecture me dude because I know at least that much.
As well, I would like to point out that half of the sources cited (to the very page) are Affiliated with Amazon dude (since you're checking) right along with just about every other site on the internet. Hell, I'll bet you are to! Which means that you may know: that snippet on the Contact Us page is apart to the Amazon TOS. In fact, ALL of those very people (cited, right there on the same page) aught to post that same snippet if they haven't already. So, tell me again what's appropriate you fool. That IS the deal for you, me, them, the rest of us: we all make our great contributions of free, relevant, and quality content/services --- and we hope to get paid a little somewhere down the line! Sound familiar dude? So tell me again, what is "inappropriate"? Sounds like a little hypocrisy to me... And if you might actually think about that for a but a second, it might sound the same to you. GET IT?
Fortunately, Wiki too has a TOS. As well, they have shot at getting around demi-gods like you. BTW, love how you killed the free press! Way to go Champ!
-RS
- Thank you for you incoherent and contradictory commentary. :) SCΛRECROW 03:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- You should try reading it.
-RS
Spam vandal
Hello, I see you reverted a spam vandal on Glock this morning. If you see more of him, you may want to mention it where I have filed at the entry to blacklist him. I've already mentioned this mornings events there. Thank you,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 14:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
- Now blacklisted.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 20:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Deletion on D7000's texts
Hello, I saw that you deleted some of my texts regarding the Nikon D7000, which I considered an impolite action. If you would like to add data, be free to do it; but don't simply delete texts that others have carefully written and revised. Thank you, Paulo Feitosa <pfeitosa@gmail.com>. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfeitosa (talk • contribs) 17:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
- I copy editied it so it read better and cited references properly. I did not think that "User Responses" was an appropriate section. And yet you removed my additions of a proper reception section and the citations. SCΛRECROW 05:13, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
excuse me, but was the point of taking away a picture? RCSprinter123 (talk) 19:42, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, all I saw was the messed up ref. The picture is restored now.SCΛRECROW 02:05, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
B-52 Edit
May I ask why my edit was undone? I believe I did everything correctly with perfectly accurate information. (P.S. I'm new to editing Wikipedia so I hope I'm asking you this in the correct location.)Jlk18000 (talk) 08:14, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Basically, you did not reference any reliable sources when you added that information and I could not find a reference to support that information either.SCΛRECROW 14:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- PS: I think BilCat also answered your question by adding the hidden comment "Only appropriate for single designers, not project leaders" to the designers field of the infobox. SCΛRECROW 14:25, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll attempt to look to see if I can find any information supporting it, and see If theres a more appropriate location for the information. Thanks. Jlk18000 (talk) 19:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Also, quick comment, maybe I'm not understanding the difference between "Project Leaders" and "Single Designers". My edit (Designer Name) was the single designer.Jlk18000 (talk) 19:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. You'll have to ask BilCat about the difference between "Project Leaders" and "Single Designers".SCΛRECROW 04:18, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
- Also, quick comment, maybe I'm not understanding the difference between "Project Leaders" and "Single Designers". My edit (Designer Name) was the single designer.Jlk18000 (talk) 19:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll attempt to look to see if I can find any information supporting it, and see If theres a more appropriate location for the information. Thanks. Jlk18000 (talk) 19:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
- PS: I think BilCat also answered your question by adding the hidden comment "Only appropriate for single designers, not project leaders" to the designers field of the infobox. SCΛRECROW 14:25, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Nikon D7000 placement
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.