Jump to content

User talk:Denisarona

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 94.168.119.106 (talk) at 15:05, 30 May 2011 (Vocaloid: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Denisarona, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Vejvančický (talk) 07:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer permission

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:28, 27 June 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks! :)) --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 08:12, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OOO! Now I see. My bad. Lovely song though, innit? Ratibgreat (talk) 16:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

There was no need for the message - I was trying to revert at same time as User:Xionbox - and have apologised direct to him. Denisarona (talk) 13:55, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You know, I looked at your edit again and again and just couldn't figure that you would have made that particular edit. I should have just posted a personal message asking you about it, rather than slap the template on you. No worries, I removed the warning. Sorry! Wikipelli Talk 14:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - no problems. Denisarona (talk) 14:04, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Denisarona,
I got the message as well. Thanks for notifying me and don't worry about it. ;-)
Xionbox 14:08, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

The IPs that have been making strange edits to the See also sections of fighter aircraft pages appear to be the same person, despite that they come from different IPs. Geolocate shows that they have the same ISP and location. Should a WP:SPI be filed? -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 12:48, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that something needs to be done and possibly blocking them may solve the problem. If you have time to file a report I have no objection - vandalism annoys me!! Denisarona (talk) 13:16, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
We'll see if they come back again. Once they've made 4 reverts using any of their IPs on the one page we can file a WP:3RR violation which almost always results in a ban; SPI is too slow to have any significant impact, as it takes a matter of days to progress an investigation. -- 李博杰  | Talk contribs email 16:12, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vocaloid

I don't know why you undid my edit to Vocaloid and I presume its over the "section blanking" tag. Please note, not all section blanking is vandalism and the section removal met the criteria of the Wikipedia guidelines. It was fan fluff, unsourced information added by a fan of Vocaloid ona subject not within wikipedia's guidelines. I could go on about it, but really don't feel like explaining more about it because we get this kind of fanfluff a lot. 94.168.119.106 (talk) 15:05, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]