Wikipedia:Sandbox
Welcome to this sandbox page, a space to experiment with editing.
You can either edit the source code ("Edit source" tab above) or use VisualEditor ("Edit" tab above). Click the "Publish changes" button when finished. You can click "Show preview" to see a preview of your edits, or "Show changes" to see what you have changed. Anyone can edit this page and it is automatically cleared regularly (anything you write will not remain indefinitely). Click here to reset the sandbox. You can access your personal sandbox by clicking here, or using the "Sandbox" link in the top right.Creating an account gives you access to a personal sandbox, among other benefits. Do NOT, under any circumstances, place promotional, copyrighted, offensive, or libelous content in sandbox pages. Doing so WILL get you blocked from editing. For more info about sandboxes, see Wikipedia:About the sandbox and Help:My sandbox. New to Wikipedia? See the contributing to Wikipedia page or our tutorial. Questions? Try the Teahouse! |
testing one two three... a
Request to amend prior case: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Ed_Poor_2
Initiated by Andries (talk) at 17:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Clauses to which an amendment is requested
- Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines
- user:Ed Poor has not violated these guidelines for articles in category:Unification Church
- The talk page topic ban should be lifted
- List of users affected by or involved in this amendment
- Andries (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (initiator), but uninvolved: I rarely edited Unification Church related subjects, except The Making of a Moonie
- Ed Poor (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Kafziel (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- KillerChihuahua (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Confirmation that the above users are aware of this request
- Username2 (diff of notification of this thread on Username2's talk page)
- Username3 (repeat above for all parties)
Amendment 1
- http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Ed_Poor_2&diff=330919237&oldid=330918451
- Strike out talk page for articles in the[ category:Unfication Church. User:Ed Poor is still not allowed to edit the article pages in the [[:category:Unification Church]
Statement by user:Andries
I formally request the arbcom to lift the talk page topic ban for Unification Church related articles of user:Ed Poor. Ed Poor is well known to be a committed long time follower of the Unification Church which he openly admits. I can understand that and why he has a article topic ban for the articles related to the Unification Church. However it seems that Ed Poor does not even dare to edit some rather unrelated talk pages, because of the possible consequences.
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&diff=prev&oldid=431407881
I check the talk pages of several Unification Church related talk pages and I saw no walls of texts or insults by Ed Poor. As far as I can see he has behaved constructively there or at least does no harm. Please understand that committed long time followers can give excellent comments on article talk pages.
See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Unification_Church
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Unification_Church_members
I know what I am talking about, because I am a critical former member of the Satya Sai Baba cult/new religious movement. I can give useful comments there. My topic ban was changed into an article only topic ban and I am now free to comment on the talk page. I can say that it was a relief to be able to comment there, because the article is about what was a big part of my life for nine years. I do not think I have done any harm with my comments and I have helped with sources.
I never had serious problems with Ed Poor regarding cults/new religious movements, though we worked together years ago. And we had some reason to get into a fight with each other because he was a current member and I am an apostate (critical former member).
See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Andries&diff=431409793&oldid=430884030
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&diff=prev&oldid=430551195
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ed_Poor&diff=431671329&oldid=431650555
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=330961567#User:Ed_Poor_-_POV_and_COI
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Ed_Poor_2#Log_of_blocks_and_bans
Thanks in advance to the arbcom members, who volunteered to do a difficult job, but have little chance to make all people happy.
Sincerely yours,
user:Andries
{Statement by editor filing request for amendment. Contained herein should be an explanation and evidence detailing why the amendment is necessary.}
Statement user:Ed Poor
{Other editors are free to comment on this amendment as necessary. Comments here should be directed only at the above proposed amendment.}
Amendment 2
- Link to principle, finding of fact, or remedy to which this amendment is requested
- Details of desired modification
Statement by your username (2)
{Statement by editor filing request for amendment. Contained herein should be an explanation and evidence detailing why the amendment is necessary.}
Statement by other editor (2)
{Other editors are free to comment on this amendment as necessary. Comments here should be directed only at the above proposed amendment.}
Further discussion
- Statements here may address all the amendments, but individual statements under each proposed amendment are preferred. If there is only one proposed amendment, then no statements should be added here.
Statement by yet another editor
Clerk notes
- This section is for administrative notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
Arbitrator views and discussion
Are there any words there? I can't read it. There's no words there!