User talk:SunCountryGuy01
Bad faith speedy deletion
Way to go-bad faith speedy tagging referenced content.
Are you for real?Rememberway (talk) 23:33, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Could you pease giv me a diff showing where I did this. Jessy (talk) (contribs) • 23:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
- Your nomination of Vi Hart for deletion I assume - you were just on this guys talkpage about an hour ago. Bob House 884 (talk) 23:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Oversight
Hi, I just wanted to confirm the edits that you said were oversighted from your talk page are deleted, as discussed in email. Did you perhaps email the oversight-l list to request the oversighting? Yes, if the edits were still visible, that could be a problem with the system, which is why it is important to look in to this. Prodego talk 00:03, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- I emailed an oversight at his personal address so that the email could not be traced on Wikipedia just to be on the safe side. Jessy (talk) (contribs) • 00:06, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry to bring up harassing edits about you, but perhaps you could search your sent email and find out which oversighter you emailed? Or did you use the Special:Emailuser feature? This was probably this week I take it? Prodego talk 00:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Please email me or the Arbitration Committee about this, SunCountryGuy01. I have some concerns about what you are suggesting here. Risker (talk) 00:28, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Email received, I have sent you a response, and will look forward to hearing back from you. Risker (talk) 00:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- Confirming, for the record, that no edits to this page have been either suppressed or oversighted. Risker (talk) 01:06, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
- I have also checked the logs for this talk page, user page, and archives and find no evidence of suppression or revision deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:21, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
MfD nomination of Wikipedia:World Intelligence Task Force
Wikipedia:World Intelligence Task Force, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:World Intelligence Task Force and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:World Intelligence Task Force during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nima1024 (talk) 19:36, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
Unblock
SunCountryGuy01 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have been away from Wikipedia far to long and long to come back. So now the truth, I made false harassment claims to both [[User:Prodego|Prodego]] and [[UseR:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]]. However, due to personal reasons, my judgement was clouded. I realize the mistakes and ask for forgiveness from the community. I know that I have a past that is not completely clean but I do think that I can learn, recuperate and become a better Wikipedia from learning from these mistakes. Regards. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been away from Wikipedia far to long and long to come back. So now the truth, I made false harassment claims to both [[User:Prodego|Prodego]] and [[UseR:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]]. However, due to personal reasons, my judgement was clouded. I realize the mistakes and ask for forgiveness from the community. I know that I have a past that is not completely clean but I do think that I can learn, recuperate and become a better Wikipedia from learning from these mistakes. Regards. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I have been away from Wikipedia far to long and long to come back. So now the truth, I made false harassment claims to both [[User:Prodego|Prodego]] and [[UseR:Dabomb87|Dabomb87]]. However, due to personal reasons, my judgement was clouded. I realize the mistakes and ask for forgiveness from the community. I know that I have a past that is not completely clean but I do think that I can learn, recuperate and become a better Wikipedia from learning from these mistakes. Regards. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}