User talk:RaptorHunter

Prepare for the Zombie apocalypse Download the (new) Wikipedia Torrent.

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Raptor Hunter's: FunFacts

"RaptorHunter is rather fearless." [1] He "rides in atop a tall steed of Truth, Justice, and the Wikipedia Way™©®—its nostrils flaring in the morning mist." [2]

Ahem

Please be careful. --John (talk) 03:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How do I strip out the IPs edits, without reverting your additions?--RaptorHunter (talk) 04:10, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use the "undo" function, or edit manually. --John (talk) 15:38, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So you know

The reason I made my edit was due to seeing this edit. Seems to be some kind of glitch that sidetracked me before I could undo my edit. If you have concerns regarding any of my edits you can always ask me. Tiderolls 01:25, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Radiation effects from Fukushima I nuclear accidents" move

Your move of "Radiation effects from Fukushima I nuclear accidents" to "Radiation effects from Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster" during an ongoing discussion whether the parent article was correctly moved is highly questionable. You cannot be unaware of the discussion, since you've participated in it. Kolbasz (talk) 17:08, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The main article was already moved by a moderator as a result of a previous discussion. The current discussion is just complaining about the result of the last discussion. My move was just to make the sub-articles match the main article. If and when, the main article moves, then the sub-articles will me moved as well.--RaptorHunter (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, including adding material to an article that there was a clear consensus to exclude on the basis of a talk page discussion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Nick-D (talk) 11:48, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

RaptorHunter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only reverted twice and both times explained my reasoning with clear edit summaries and used reliable sources. I then took the issue to the talk page Talk:Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandal#Heckler_at_resignation After discussing the issue on the talk page and with the help of another editor [3] I attempted a much reduced 3rd edit that I thought would be an effective compromise: [4] How can this be considered edit warring when I brought the issue to the talk page, actively sought the input of other editors and attempted a compromise? When my contribution was rejected, I stopped. WP:3RR was not violated. Many hours after this is all over I am blocked? I was trying to follow the rules. --RaptorHunter (talk) 04:37, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I only reverted twice and both times explained my reasoning with clear edit summaries and used reliable sources. I then took the issue to the talk page [[Talk:Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandal#Heckler_at_resignation]] After discussing the issue on the talk page and with the help of another editor [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandal&diff=434850616&oldid=434846500] I attempted a much reduced 3rd edit that I thought would be an effective compromise: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandal&diff=434858315&oldid=434843100] 

How can this be considered edit warring when I brought the issue to the talk page, actively sought the input of other editors and attempted a compromise? When my contribution was rejected, I stopped. [[WP:3RR]] was not violated. Many hours after this is all over I am blocked? I was trying to follow the rules. --[[User:RaptorHunter|RaptorHunter]] ([[User talk:RaptorHunter|talk]]) 04:37, 18 June 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I only reverted twice and both times explained my reasoning with clear edit summaries and used reliable sources. I then took the issue to the talk page [[Talk:Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandal#Heckler_at_resignation]] After discussing the issue on the talk page and with the help of another editor [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandal&diff=434850616&oldid=434846500] I attempted a much reduced 3rd edit that I thought would be an effective compromise: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandal&diff=434858315&oldid=434843100] 

How can this be considered edit warring when I brought the issue to the talk page, actively sought the input of other editors and attempted a compromise? When my contribution was rejected, I stopped. [[WP:3RR]] was not violated. Many hours after this is all over I am blocked? I was trying to follow the rules. --[[User:RaptorHunter|RaptorHunter]] ([[User talk:RaptorHunter|talk]]) 04:37, 18 June 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I only reverted twice and both times explained my reasoning with clear edit summaries and used reliable sources. I then took the issue to the talk page [[Talk:Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandal#Heckler_at_resignation]] After discussing the issue on the talk page and with the help of another editor [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandal&diff=434850616&oldid=434846500] I attempted a much reduced 3rd edit that I thought would be an effective compromise: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anthony_Weiner_sexting_scandal&diff=434858315&oldid=434843100] 

How can this be considered edit warring when I brought the issue to the talk page, actively sought the input of other editors and attempted a compromise? When my contribution was rejected, I stopped. [[WP:3RR]] was not violated. Many hours after this is all over I am blocked? I was trying to follow the rules. --[[User:RaptorHunter|RaptorHunter]] ([[User talk:RaptorHunter|talk]]) 04:37, 18 June 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}