User talk:Causa sui

This is Causa sui's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11: 1 days

Guru Singh

Otrs

Hi, I want to thank you for your comment/support at my OTRS volunteer application which I am pleased to report was successful. I will be starting steadily but look forward to contributing and assisting in this new area, regards. Off2riorob (talk) 10:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Xavier Weisenreder III

ok, thanks for the tip. cheers -- The Elves Of Dunsimore (talk) 07:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hemp

Hi Causa Sui At 07:10, 27 June 2011 you reverted an edit by Nickstarinfinity (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) on the Hemp page. Nickstarinfinity had made numerous edits to that page. At 07:14, 27 June 2011, 4 minutes after your revert, a new user calling himsef Nickhemp registred and proceeded to make multiple edits to the same hemp page. I saw something odd when today I spotted references to "Cannabis industrialis". I tried to do a DNS lookup, but loks like that function is no longer available. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 17:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Message

I was signed as DEMSAGROUP for business aims. To chnage my boss Demet Cetindogan page. But as I got an coution about the account I delete the entries and now I am on my account to add this information. There was two coutions about the entry. First one is account the second one was the source doesn't have the same biography. I did that because my past edits has a coution to sont hve the same informationa as it is on the page. But confusingly now the system told me to have the exact information on the site. So I changed the biography on the site to exactly the biography to the one that is written for wikipedia. Regards. Atif UNALDI — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atifunaldi (talk • contribs) 07:12, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question re: declined speedy for Vivek vk jain

Hi there, Causa Sui. I see you declined my speedy delete request for Vivek vk jain and 'PROD'ded the article for the much lengthier process.

Given that the article creator has the same name, this is a pretty clear case of WP:COI, as I see it. I spent some time in various search engines looking this guy up, and the claims of notability did not check out: all I found were his own blog posts. My question is, is the mere self-assertion of notability (by a self-creator, in this case) a reason not to add the speedy template, under Wikipedia guidelines, or is there 'grey area' around this? If the former is policy, does this not add to the burden at Afd? I also found it of interest that the creator had self-removed the speedy template and failed to respond in any way on the article talk page or his own. Thanks for helping me to understand this issue, Jus da fax 07:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I added a {{Prod-2}} to that one (although I also think it's WP:CSD#A7) … BTW, you might consider adding an {{Old prod full}} to an article's Talk page when you PROD or 2nd a PROD (as I already did for this one), since it can only be done once, and a previous PROD can get lost in the edit history. — 70.21.17.51 (talk) 23:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Missed one

Hello, Causa sui … FYI, you neglected to delete the Talk page for Anna Mott‎ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Happy Editing! — 70.21.17.51 (talk · contribs) _{23:04, 30 June 2011 (UTC)}[reply]

I don't know about precedent, but it appears to be SOP for most admins to delete the talk page as well. — 70.21.17.51 (talk) 23:15, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]