User talk:Omgosh30

Parma F.C. statistics

The first thing is that I've been looking at the Italian-languaged version for old squads and such. Even though I'm not an Italian-speaking person, it's fairly easy to find things on | Italian Wikipedia. To come to Parma's season articles, browse Parma Football Club xxxx-xxxx and you are getting there. As for the statistics I recommend | RSSSF, which has all sorts of Association football statistics and results imaginable, so to get to Italian football then press Current Domestic Results to be up to date with Parma's results from the 2010-11 season, when it's begun. For older results, then go for Historical domestic results. Best of luck, cheers! Roslagen (talk) 09:38, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page Category:1996–97 in Serie A. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. GorillaWarfare ^talk 22:32, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Massimo Gobbi

NO one add onward on infobox, please follow the MOS suggested by the Football Project. Matthew_hk t c 18:24, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I genuinely have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.Omgosh30 (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the year you added for Gobbi's infobox: 2010-onwards

MOS suggested no words in the year section: 2010-Present (wrong), 2010-onwards (wrong); 2010- (right). Matthew_hk t c 16:43, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok. Fair enough. Omgosh30 (talk) 16:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Parma FC

It is no sense to remove players from the loan list. Abdou Doumbia and Gianluca Lapadula has signed a contract with Parma and announced by Parma FC official web site, they were loaned to Cisco Roma. This is your first warning, if you continued to remove them, i will report to ANI. Matthew_hk t c 18:36, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.ciscocalcioroma.it/news.php?nid=4920

http://www.fcparma.com/settore-giovanile/archivio-settore-giovanile/7060-il-punto-sul-mercato-delle-giovanili-del-parma.html (In uscita il difensore Abel Gigli, Gianluca Lapadula e Abdou Doumbia, classe 1990, che si sono accasati con l’ Atletico Roma.) Matthew_hk t c 18:37, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While I appreciate the militant tone, you might consider reviewing previous efforts from others to revert my edits in similar situations before threatening me with a report to "ANI", whatever that is.Omgosh30 (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, Daniel Ciofani did under contract with Parma, you may create a section for players under contract but unlikely to remain in the squad/pending a loan deal. Remove them was not a good way. De la Red was once listed in Current squad of Real Madrid until his long term injury is confirmed. If you think just remove all players that you don't know is effort, you will appear in ANI. Matthew_hk t c 16:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not doing any of those things. I'm going by the official sources. Which is as far as I know the right way to do things. I'm not convinced I'm catching the full gist of what you're trying to say, given that English isn't your first language, but I'm pretty confused as to how you've jumped to those conclusions. Omgosh30 (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doumbia and Lapadula appeared in official source of both clubs, as cited above. Ciofani appeared in Cisco Roma and www.legaseriea.it (despite not appered in any source of Parma web). You ARE removed players you don't know. Matthew_hk t c 16:34, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I am fully aware of them. I removed them because they're not listed in the club's site's source or the released list of squad numbers. Read this. In the case of leagues with squad numbers, players should generally only be listed if they have a first team shirt number, have played first team football for the club in the past, or do not have a number due to being new signings. Omgosh30 (talk) 16:37, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I said, just look like Juventus FC, you can add a section for other players who under contract. You still not explained why Doumbia and Lapadula were removed. Likes FC Braca, some players were never played but listed in out on loan section. Matthew_hk t c 16:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What? I explained their absence by their not having a squad number. Juventus are the only club I've seen with an additional section, so sorry I missed that! Any other examples, so that I know that's not an anomaly? Omgosh30 (talk) 16:46, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I said, played signed and immediately loaned out, were listed. you quote is for first team squad section but not for out on loan section. AND MoS is not a bible. I'm a member of Football Project for many years, you could bring the case to WP:footy. Matthew_hk t c 16:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The aim of that quoted "rules", was to prevent people listed every youth players in "first team" (with first team numbers and some additional criteria means he is a member of the first team) and prevent every new signing were listed in first team regardless his age. Matthew_hk t c 17:01, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well the rules seem utterly redundant then. You'd think that if what you say is right the template would make some mention of the allowed leeway. Omgosh30 (talk) 17:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kit Templates

Hello, I saw you had a question about kit templates awhile back. I just updated the Template:Football_kit documentation. Hopefully it can answer some of your questions. Wikipedia Commons is the best place to look for templates. I'm working now to organize it, but it's a rather large task (there are 6000+ that are uncategorized!). Udeezy (talk) 16:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

test

lol

John Aloisi

Hi there OMGOSH, VASCO from Portugal here,

Seeing that i use sometimes those words in my summaries (sometimes exaggerated, sometimes not), but not in this player's case, it seems you have seen some of my edit history, then proceeded to make fun of me, why i really don't know :(

Furthermore, the article does need a total makeover, which i now will make (article refers to players which don't have anything to do with Aloisi, and the first section should be titled EARLY YEARS / ENGLAND as i put it, i just did not write storyline about BELGIUM and ITALY, was saving it for today).

Would really like to have some feedback from you if it's possible. Attentively - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 15:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you refer to this edit (please see here http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Filipe_Oliveira&diff=432934539&oldid=430419781), when using the word "rubbish" i mentioned the messy - i sometimes use "utter mess" instead - state of infobox, all scrambled up. Once i referred YOU, i used the word "kindly", and still you make fun of me for wanting to improve an article (Aloisi's)? A real "downer"... --Vasco Amaral (talk) 15:15, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me but i did alter the state of the box in Filipe Oliveira significantly ("edit only" keep in mind), it was in my opinion scrambled up. Of course one when views the page without clicking "edit this page", it looks exactly the same, i agree.

About the rest (and most important): i admitted my summaries are sometimes exaggerated - i have used worse when dealing with lowlife vandals. Since you used the same ridiculous (i once again admit i sometimes am just that in my summaries) words as me in an article which had none of that in the summaries, only VASCOAMARAL editing, it's only fair to think you were belittling me. If i am wrong in my assumption, i apologize, but i have a bad feeling about it, this whole ordeal and your reply to my talkpage suggest you are (one of so many) disgusted by my wiki-manners and want nothing to do with me. You also don't saying "i did not mean to make fun of you, not my intention" after my "attack" implying that you did, suggests you did intend to make fun of me, fair enough...

Happy editing - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 15:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, could you have a look at Aloisi's STATISTICS chart and correct two errors (i am terrible at those)? He split 1995/96 with both ANTWERP and CREMONESE, and his seasons in Italy were one in Serie A and another in Serie B. Thank you in advance. - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 15:55, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Was only asking for your assistance (part of it was solved, not all, the 1995/96 season), but i guess that exaggerated summary of mine (which i have already explained) has put me in your black list for good, not one word of feedback. OK, i won't bother you anymore, expect the exact same courtesy if your approach is going to be negative please. --Vasco Amaral (talk) 23:43, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Surrey CCC

Thanks for your recent work on improving articles connected to Surrey CCC. As a Surrey fan myself, this is something that I'm glad to see. I don't know if you're aware that there's a cricket WikiProject, which perhaps you might be interested in joining. JH (talk page) 17:23, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the records articles. I'd suggest adding Mark Ramprakash's innings back to the table of highest scores made for Surrey. It seems a bit strange to have five of the innings over 300 but to omit the sixth, and since the introduction says "generally five" it wouldn't create a problem. JH (talk page) 18:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) JH (talk page) 18:53, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Parma

puoi chiedere anche al bar del progetto calcio, per quanto riguarda i legami tra il Parma ed il Verdi :).. 93.56.32.96 (talk) 10:33, 19 August 2011 (UTC) Ps: ho segnalato la creazione del tuo concittadino Umberto Busani, puoi dare per favore uno sguardo alla voce qui su en.wiki?[reply]

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Matthew_hk t c 16:47, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

italian task force

do you want some articles to create here on en.wiki? I wrote some of them here and I have other ready to be created.. come puoi vedere il mio inglese non è il massimo che si può desiderare.. 93.56.37.151 (talk) 20:27, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Il tuo Inglese è buono, un po' grossolano nelle sfumature ma in ogni caso buono. It's good to practise! I only have time to concentrate on Parma player articles... Omg † osh 09:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ah, okay, non c'è problema :).. non credo di avere molti giocatori del Parma di 40 o più anni fa, caso mai te lo riferisco :).. thanks for your words about my english, here in Italy it's almost impossible using the language.. 93.56.42.42 (talk) 17:51, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fammi sapere! Omg † osh 01:09, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

lui qui su en.wikipedia non c'è.. 93.56.17.239 (talk) 20:30, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

comunque se trovi un po' più persone pronte a lavorare sull'italian task force dillo che posso dare una mano a quel progetto, in questo momento sono in wikipause su it.wikipedia ma potrei darvi volentieri una mano.. 93.56.45.94 (talk) 17:20, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]