Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Request board

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 96.3.139.41 (talk) at 23:31, 7 September 2011 (→‎Standardized conjugation chart). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Click here to add a new request.

This affects the navigation archive box at WP:UNDELETE when the template max is exceeded. Searches are unaffected. --Trevj (talk) 12:08, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dynamic Bible Articles

Could we create a dynamic paraphrase Bible? The article on Second Timothy has a section titled, "Content," but it is opinions and descriptions of the text in 2nd Timothy - not the actual text/content of that Bible book. I would like to start with the KJV text and then see what editors develop. The page would have notes dealing with the Hebrew/Greek for each verse. Would these violate any guidelines? Just checking. OpusScript (talk) 13:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Michael Jingozian biography

In June, a biography of a living person, Michael Jingozian, was tagged with the following three objections:

--“This biography of a living person needs additional references or sources for verification.” --“It is written like an advertisement and needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view.” --“It may have been edited by a contributor who has a close connection with its subject.”

I’ve relied on these objections to rewrite the biography of Mr. Jingozian. My goal is to ensure that the biography meets all of Wikipedia’s standards.

The rewritten biography was posted on Wikipedia in early August; however the same three objections are still listed.

The URL is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Jingozian

Could you kindly let me know if the rewritten biography has been reviewed, and whether the biography requires further editing to satisfy any Wikipedia objections?

Thank you for your assistance.

Alan Lohner

50.53.73.223 (talk) 17:47, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Standardized conjugation chart

Could a standardized conjugation chart be agreed upon? Maybe not for all languages, but for at least language types (Romantic, Cyrillic, Asiatic, ect.)?96.3.139.41 (talk) 23:31, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]