Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annie Lavery

Annie Lavery

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

So many issues for this article. This article could not establish notability from third-party sources, the content may have violated WP:CP by plagiarizing from other websites, and there are no references. Even self-published materials, such as hundreds of episodes and scripts, are insufficient to have this article stand on its own. Previously PRODded; challenged by IP editor who could not at this time improve this article and claimed that this fictional character is "notable". Actually, the cancelled soap All My Children is notable from many sources; is this character notable, as well? ~~--Gh87 (talk) 20:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC)~~ I vote delete as well. --Gh87 (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this article has existed since 2006, although that doesn't meen that it should be kept. L888Y5 (talk) 20:56, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A very well-documented non-existent person. Can WP refer to Soap Central, I wonder? or Soaps She Knows? She's documented like a real human. I know IMDB isn't on. Guess that's a Delete but it does feel like being grandad telling off the kids for, er, being alive. Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:31, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article sites correct and useful information pertaining to an historic and notable character. Deleting the article should not be in question.Casanova88 (talk) 19:23, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you prove this character's "notability", especially from the third-party sources? By the way, you have ignored instructions of WP:AFD by removing the AfD banner. It is not the same as WP:PROD --Gh87 (talk) 19:29, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize about the removal of the banner. The character of Annie has been listed in various books pertaining to AMC (and published by ABC) and also in magazines.Casanova88 (talk) 19:50, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The fictional character does not meet the general notability guideline, the article is completely unreferenced and it is a plot-only description of a fictional work, unsuitable for Wikipedia. Jfgslo (talk) 07:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: This character is incredibly notable and well known within and outside the soap world. Deleting the article would be a travesty and an intent to remove the information on purpose.149.4.206.16 (talk) 15:28, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]