User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise

Note: If you leave a message here I will most often respond here

Fakirbakir

This unpleasantness with Samofi has crossed my path a few times now, and I'm not really trying to get involved, but I had to investigate one thing - please see User talk:Fakirbakir#statement about Slovakia. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 10:36, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AltGr

I have just started a section Talk:AltGr_key#Keypress_and_keyboard about this distinction. --Mirokado (talk) 21:43, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Future Perfect at Sunrise! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Your Zeal

We might have had our disagreements, but your zeal is needed here. This user has had very lengthy problems with uploading incorrect and sometimes knowingly false image licensing tags. What is going on now is probably about the fourth time that someone has talked to the user. The user doesn't really seem to care, and continues with business as usual. I think he/she means well, but this matter really does need an admin to tell the user that this is not a game and putting fake image copyright tags on Wikipedia is very serious. I think you would be the perfect person to do it. -OberRanks (talk) 21:28, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: AE thread and followup

Very well, I have no interested in this wikidramu beyond stating that the treatment of some editors was unfair. I will go and remove my post. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 01:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I also asked for ArbCom clarification of your interpretation of i-ban. Since I mention you there, this is a courtesy link: Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Request_for_clarification:_Wikipedia:EEML. Please note I am doing this in good faith, trying to understand the intricacies of the wikilaws here. If the ArbCom supports your interpretation, rest assured I will try my best to abide by it. At this time, however, I respectfully disagree, as I believe it imparts on my right to free speech. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 02:30, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Voyevoda and Lvivske

Please note my last messages at User talk:Voyevoda and Talk:Ukrainians. Thanks. GreyHood ^Talk 00:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Voyevoda

Re Voevoda: He refers to Ukrainians as "свидомиты"- svidomites, i.e. a conflation of terms "svidomyj" (lit.-aware, i.e. ethnically conscious) and "sodomites" (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Greyhood&diff=458144140&oldid=458142617). Not nice. Voyevoda language pattern and his use of obscure and tendentious sources also closely correspond to those of the currtently indeffed user Kuban Kazak. Worth checking for socks.--Galassi (talk) 00:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ukrainians

Your actions are entirely justified. I made a few edit mistakes because I have not devoted attention to other users corrections. I'll be completely honest with you because you did your job very professionally. My latest changes were related only to Ukrainians because I didn't wanted to allow users such as Voyevoda to sabotage the site. I must admit, that for further work on Wikipedia I'm not interested. Unhonest user and provocator Voyevoda is the reason why am I still here. Before that, I've always tried to do my job professionally, for examplle this is my work: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Ukrainians_Ukraine_english_version.jpg, or maybe this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Kievan_Rus%27_Kyivan_Rus%27_early_formation_862_912.jpg ... Sources, facts and names are law for me, but Wikipedia is in realy big mess because of users such as Voyevoda - there is no even political opinions but a pure provocation and hatred of Ukrainians national selfindetification (postcolonial problem). I am grateful for what you have intervened! Best regards!--SeikoEn (talk) 07:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Other users

One more thing, in my opinion Lvivske and Galassi are realy not responsible for edit war situation. And, it seems to me that Greyhood only supports Voyevoda's russian postion, but still isn't responsible for edit war as Voyevoda. Thanks!--SeikoEn (talk) 07:41, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]