Talk:Dragon Ball

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.

Anime and manga: Dragon Ball B‑class High‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dragon Ball work group.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Dragon Ball (manga) archive
Dragon Ball GT archive

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by .

Stop removing Tienshinhan

In the plot summary it mentions Emperor Pilaf, the Red Ribbon Army, and both Piccolo's. There are five major groups or sagas in Part 1 of Dragon Ball. The five villains of those Sagas were Emperor Pilaf, the Red Ribon Army, Tienshinhan, King Piccolo, and Piccolo Jr.. He should be there.STFX1046190 (talk) 19:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC) On the contrary he should absolutely not be there. Tienshinhan was not a villain just a temporary rival for goku in both fighting capabilities and mentality.His behavior and actions never altered the outcomes of goku's battles or the world for that matter.Tien was bound to become a hero because of his kind heart.--MartianH (talk) 00:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A question:

Why is this rated mid importance on anime/manga scale?

Dragon Ball is probably one of, if not the most well known anime/manga series outside of Japan, and a quick look at google trends shows that it has on average more searches for it than Akira, or Gundam, which are both High importance. 69.132.79.61 (talk) 19:04, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

High and Top importance are for anime or manga that have moved beyond just being popular, but have also had a lasting impact—either on its genre, critically, or culturally—decades after it was created. Gundam completely redefined its genre and Akira was one of the first anime films to receive wide spread critical acclamation outside of Japan. Currently, there is no such documentation of a similar impact by Dragon Ball. —Farix (t | c) 20:25, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Dragon Ball has been spoofed several times in both American and Japanese Pop Culture, is credited (along with Sailor Moon) as having made Anime and Manga popular outside of Japan, and has influenced several of the most popular manga including Yu Yu Hakush, Naruto, and One Piece.STFX1046190 (talk) 01:48, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree, Dragon Ball should be rated "high". It is the most popular manga/anime around the world. On Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Assessment's Importance scale; Gundam is used as an example for "high" because of its "Lasting impact decades after it was initially released". Dragon Ball would also fall into that category. Xfansd (talk) 03:36, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Ball should definitely be High as it defined the Shonen manga. It's the foundation on which all subsequent series have been built, and without it plenty of those we have now either would not exist at all or would be so different as to be unrecognizable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.83.6 (talk) 20:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anime fans by in large hate Dragon Ball in part because of its enormous long lasting popularity. PeRshGo (talk) 03:49, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's the silliest thing that I've ever heard. --69.136.96.78 (talk) 22:13, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is?STFX1046190 (talk) 08:06, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Soo... Will one of you guys bring this up to whoever makes the descion of rating the articles? 24.154.119.139 (talk) 18:14, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GT

Shouldnt it be mentione that most fans hate GT? Redyugioh (talk) 21:24, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you can properly source such a statement and write it in an encyclopedic tone, then maybe. But really the fan opinion doesn't matter as much as actual critics'--GroovySandwich 21:38, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous this is wikipedia not a fan site.This article is based on facts not opinion, if you could find a legitimate source that implies that people hate GT then by all means add it .Be sure to note that GT was made because of fans asking for more so your statement would contradict that.--MartianH (talk) 00:58, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Superman Influence

Shouldn't it be mentioned that Dragonball was heavily influenced by DC Comics Superman? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Herojoe1000 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See my above comment--GroovySandwich 03:15, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Akira Toriyama is rumor to be making a new Dragon Ball series alongside mangaka Naho Ooishi, The creator of the 2008 Dragon Ball Z special "Yo! son goku and friends return". called, Dragon Ball Hoshi. Ooishi will be making a manga that continues the Z Manga past the Buu saga. It will have a newly designed Super Saiyan 4, and even a Super Saiyan 5. Akira Toriyama will be assisting her and backing off. The events in japan (earthquake, tsunami) slowed this down now Toriyama is taking care of that. It's rumor to be out later this year or early 2012"get rid of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.51.195 (talk) 04:15, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A few small issues

The article doesn't seem to make clarification of dragon ball anime reception from dragon ball Z, was wondering if that can be cleared up. Also there sems to be using the word "Specials" for OVA and TV Anime films, maybe some clarification should be done.Lucia Black (talk) 21:41, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 7 December 2011

It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Dragon Ball. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)

This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".

The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |answered=no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected or on hold awaiting user input. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category. You may also wish to use the {{ESp}} template in the response. To request that a page be protected or unprotected, make a protection request.

Rodneytaylorboii (talk) 01:05, 7 December 2011 (UTC) AT SOME POINT YOU SHOULD MENTION THE LESS FAMOUSE CHARECTER, SUPER FELICITY.[reply]