Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voldi Way

Voldi Way

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of WP:notability. Bit part actor and businessman. Only reference is to imdb where he appears to have had 3 bit bits. No sources for business career. Google searches reveal nothing significant. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 12:44, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Could go either way on this, the guy did create a notable game company (WayForward Technologies) but that's the company, not the person. Cutting that out, there's little to go on regarding Way as a notable person outside of that but I feel if there's any way to keep it it'll be on his videogame career, not on his paltry acting credits. tutterMouse (talk) 14:37, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would like to point out that the article was de-prodded by User:Voldiway as that user's first (and only at the time of this writing) edit. The article creator works for the company (WayForward Technologies) created by the article's subject. So, there's certainly a conflict-of-interest problem here. I agree with TuttleMouse otherwise, a very weak keep flavored with a feeling that he might not turn out notable after all (if sources are found). -- stillnotelf is invisible 19:42, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to WayForward Technologies since Voldi Way himself seems to get very little personal coverage independent of his company. The only other possibility would be a redirect to The Changeling (film) but I don't think that is a good idea since he is not mentioned in that article and I think the company he founded would be a more relevant article than a single film he appeared in.--70.24.207.225 (talk) 20:19, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]