Talk:Nanban (2012 film)
Film: Indian Start‑class | ||||||||||
|
India: Cinema Unassessed | |||||||||||||
|
Name Changes
Why is the name of the film being changed constantly? ie Namban to Moovar (a re-direct to Namban. This is why wp:Crystal Ball articles are a pain. And no refereneces, this article should probably be deleted! - 220.101 talk\Contribs 15:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
Budget
Found many sites citing the budget of the film as 60 crores.
- kollyinsider.com
- way2sms and may more. Is this the actual budget or fake one? Karthik Nadar (talk) 13:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- If we get any contradicting sources, we can change it. Till then, it seems all right. Secret of success Talk to me 11:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
File:Nanbanshoot.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
An image used in this article, File:Nanbanshoot.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC) |
Edit request on 1 January 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
DATE OF RELEASE HAS BEEN 12TH JANUARY 2012 PUBLISHED IN DAILY NEWSPAPER ON 01-01-2012 Jeeva bharathi (talk) 06:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. This source says it will release on Thai Pongal, which is the 14th or 15th this year. — Bility (talk) 03:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Release date updated with proper sources.WikiMan88 (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 2 January 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information
117.206.50.208 (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Proper edit made.All Izz Well!!! WikiMan88 (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 2 January 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
.
117.206.49.192 (talk) 16:04, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- Is there a specific place you want to add a .?--Jac16888 Talk 16:07, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 3 January 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
pls put another poster
117.213.53.9 (talk) 15:08, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
- Poster updated.WikiMan88 (talk) 15:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 5 January 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information
117.206.50.198 (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done What "wrong information"? Please clarify what needs to be changed and indicate why your request is necessary --Bryce (talk | contribs) 13:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 5 January 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
you hav written that inital reports sujjested that surya was the front runner for 3 idiots remake....that's absolutely wwrong vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information. 117.213.48.111 (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Not done: None of the site mentions that Vijay was the first runner, but TOI clearly mentions that the first tunner was Surya. -- Karthik Nadar 11:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Owe an apology. The info were actually right. Keep up the spirit. -- Karthik Nadar 14:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 6 January 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Those sites clearly mentiones that vijay was the front runner and surya was the second choice..Gemini film circuits initially signed up with vijay for the remake of 3 idiots..later he walked out due to some reasons,,then surya was the next choice.. see this http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html
Or see this.....jst see the last paragraph .. Vijay, who were the first choice of 3 Idiots remake, have walked out of it due to various reasons. Then the makers thought of remaking it with Surya in both the languages. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details
117.206.61.49 (talk) 13:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Done: Good work. -- Karthik Nadar 14:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- The Times of India article is from 8 January 2010, and says that Suriya was the very first person considered for the lead role, but he immediately declined. (Please note, nowhere it is mentioned that Suriya actually was signed for the film, he never was part of the film, he was just considered for the role!) Vijay then was signed and left it by December 2010. Suriya was again considered for the role, before Vijay "came back" (as Sify cites!) in January 2011. Everything absolutely correct! Johannes003 (talk) 16:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- And please note another point: When Suriya was considered first for the role in January 2010, neither Gemini Film Circuit nor Shankar were part of the project. Vijay was only signed after Shankar was confirmed as the director and GFC confirmed as the production studio! Doubts clear? Johannes003 (talk) 16:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
- Still a lot confused, though looks true. -- Karthik Nadar 16:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 7 January 2012
It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Nanban (2012 film). (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
- Start-Class film articles
- Start-Class Indian cinema articles
- Indian cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- Unassessed India articles
- Unknown-importance India articles
- Unassessed-Class India articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Indian cinema articles
- Unknown-importance Indian cinema articles
- Unassessed-Class Indian cinema articles of Unknown-importance
- WikiProject Indian cinema articles
- WikiProject India articles
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests
- Wikipedia edit requests possibly using incorrect templates