Talk:Imperfect self-defense

Law Start‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 20 December 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

I'll get more cites soon. Bearian (talk) 03:18, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that neither of the reference links provided actually link to the cases cited. They each link to different copies of the same recent Iowa case. That case, however, does cite both of the cases used here as references. I still think this should be merged into Self-defense (theory). --Evb-wiki (talk) 04:53, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy

The Controversy section is uncited, and has been tagged since April. I am aware of no legal academic who argues the position put forth. I am being WP:Bold and removing it. --e Robert-Houdin 20:05, 5 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rober-houdin (talk • contribs)

Clarity

If someone wants to expand the article, it needs two big things: 1) the fact that, at least in the United States, it is a minority rule and 2) a list of which jurisdictions it is good law in. --Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} via alternate account 13:59, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]