Jump to content

Talk:Nanban (2012 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 117.206.55.29 (talk) at 07:09, 24 January 2012 (→‎Edit request on 24 January 2012: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFilm: Indian C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.
WikiProject iconIndia: Cinema Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup.

Name Changes

Why is the name of the film being changed constantly? ie Namban to Moovar (a re-direct to Namban. This is why wp:Crystal Ball articles are a pain. And no refereneces, this article should probably be deleted! - 220.101 talk\Contribs 15:53, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Budget

Found many sites citing the budget of the film as 60 crores.

If we get any contradicting sources, we can change it. Till then, it seems all right. Secret of success Talk to me 11:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nanbanshoot.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Nanbanshoot.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 1 January 2012

DATE OF RELEASE HAS BEEN 12TH JANUARY 2012 PUBLISHED IN DAILY NEWSPAPER ON 01-01-2012 Jeeva bharathi (talk) 06:56, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. This source says it will release on Thai Pongal, which is the 14th or 15th this year. — Bility (talk) 03:57, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Release date updated with proper sources.WikiMan88 (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 2 January 2012

vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information



117.206.50.208 (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proper edit made.All Izz Well!!! WikiMan88 (talk) 07:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 3 January 2012

pls put another poster

117.213.53.9 (talk) 15:08, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Poster updated.WikiMan88 (talk) 15:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 5 January 2012

vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information

117.206.50.198 (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done What "wrong information"? Please clarify what needs to be changed and indicate why your request is necessary --Bryce (talk | contribs) 13:21, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 5 January 2012

you hav written that inital reports sujjested that surya was the front runner for 3 idiots remake....that's absolutely wwrong vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information. 117.213.48.111 (talk) 17:40, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: None of the site mentions that Vijay was the first runner, but TOI clearly mentions that the first tunner was Surya. -- Karthik Nadar 11:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Owe an apology. The info were actually right. Keep up the spirit. -- Karthik Nadar 14:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 6 January 2012

Those sites clearly mentiones that vijay was the front runner and surya was the second choice..Gemini film circuits initially signed up with vijay for the remake of 3 idiots..later he walked out due to some reasons,,then surya was the next choice.. see this http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html

Or see this.....jst see the last paragraph .. Vijay, who were the first choice of 3 Idiots remake, have walked out of it due to various reasons. Then the makers thought of remaking it with Surya in both the languages. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details

117.206.61.49 (talk) 13:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: Good work. -- Karthik Nadar 14:38, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Times of India article is from 8 January 2010, and says that Suriya was the very first person considered for the lead role, but he immediately declined. (Please note, nowhere it is mentioned that Suriya actually was signed for the film, he never was part of the film, he was just considered for the role!) Vijay then was signed and left it by December 2010. Suriya was again considered for the role, before Vijay "came back" (as Sify cites!) in January 2011. Everything absolutely correct! Johannes003 (talk) 16:07, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And please note another point: When Suriya was considered first for the role in January 2010, neither Gemini Film Circuit nor Shankar were part of the project. Vijay was only signed after Shankar was confirmed as the director and GFC confirmed as the production studio! Doubts clear? Johannes003 (talk) 16:12, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Still a lot confused, though looks true. -- Karthik Nadar 16:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 7 January 2012

.. 117.206.48.234 (talk) 07:42, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


That article was completely wrong.Even vijay had said in many interviews that he want to act in the remake of 3 idiots and is in the plan of remaking it.Only one article says that suriya was the front runner.Then only gemini film circuits signed up with shankar and vijay for the remake of 3 idiots.Surya was not any part of the film.No other website says that surya was the front runner.You are absolutely wrong.kindly change this wrong information.

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 07:57, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 7 January 2012

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2010-12-05/news-interviews/28224406_1_vijay-film-latest-buzz http://www.southdreamz.com/2010/07/vijays-next-movies-with-seeman-lingusamy-shankar-vikaram-k-kumar.html http://www.tamilnow.com/magazine/vijay-with-3-idiots-377.html jst see these websites..surya was not a part of project

117.206.48.234 (talk) 08:00, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

vijay was shakar's first choice for nanban,,,,,,,surya was the second choice. You can refer any websites.. http://www.supergoodmovies.com/12266/tollywood/why-is-suriya-out-of-nanban-3-idiots-remake-news-details (check the last para) http://www.sify.com/movies/how-vijay-came-back-to-3-idiots-news-tamil-lb5kpcfijbg.html http://www.sify.com/movies/scoop-vijay-out-of-3-idiots-news-tamil-kmekahefbie.html http://behindwoods.com/tamil-movie-news-1/jan-11-04/vijay-suriya-27-01-11.html Kindly change that wrong information 117.206.50.198

117.206.48.234 (talk) 08:01, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done Please stop making multiple requests after the first one has been already marked as done. Thank you. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 08:13, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is done..no changes have been done so far........???????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.206.48.234 (talk) 18:38, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 8 January 2012

surya was not a part of the project.....the article on toi was wrong,,,no other swebsites says about it,,,,,,so remove it..

117.213.48.223 (talk) 08:11, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Already discussed above. Please take a look. X.One SOS 09:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request to add more reviews and critical response by username "Kamalakannan1985"


Edit request on 12 January 2012


In the critical reception section I would like to add

Nanban - 3.5/5, Very nice and touching film, blends message with super fun in the right proposition. It's teamwork of Shankar, Vijay & rest. Source : https://twitter.com/#!/sri50

Its all show of Vijay. Nanban Rating 3.5/5. source : http://www.kollyinsider.com/2012/01/nanban-movie-online-review-nanban.html

all is well. source : http://www.top10cinema.com/review/14099/nanban

Nanban a journey for everyone. source : :http://pluzmedia.com/reviews/kollywood/27621/nanban-movie-review

Nanban rocks.. he ends up as an adorable friend. source : http://movies.sulekha.com/tamil/nanban/reviews/90453.htm

Nanban - 4.5/5. source : http://www.accesskollywood.com/moviereview-id-nanban-review68.htm

Nanban - 4.5/5. source : http://cini.in/reviews/movie-reviews/nanban-movie-review/

Nanban - 4/5. http://reviews.in.88db.com/index.php/movie/movie-reviews/14917-nanban-tamil-movie-review

nanban - 4/5. source : http://www.supergoodmovies.com/37054/kollywood/nanban-movie-review-movie-review-details

Kamalakannan1985 (talk) 05:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done — Sorry, none of them are notable or reliable sources except Sulekha. This can be done after the article is rid of unnotable reviews. X.One SOS 15:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 13 January 2012

Sify gave 5/5 stars ...pls include that also.. 117.206.52.8 (talk) 09:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

N Not done. Sify ratings are user generated like ImDb and they only give a verdict of the film in words. X.One SOS 15:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 14 January 2012

sify gave 5/5 stars 117.206.59.216 (talk) 09:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See above. The rating is not given by the reviewer, it is user generated. X.One SOS 09:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 14 January 2012

lo;..nanban budjet is not 25 crores 117.206.59.216 (talk) 16:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changed.WikiMan88 (talk) 17:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 15 January 2012

post the collection upto 2 days 117.206.58.248 (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Additionally, stop spamming this talk page with multiple requests. Please try to only make ONE request, containing EXACTLY of what you need done, instead of making a million. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 04:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 15 January 2012

3 days Box office collection report to be added in Box Office Section :

Total First 3 Days Collections all over India is at 43.5 Crores

source  : http://www.andhrabeats.in/2012/01/nanban-3-days-collections-report-44.html another source : http://superwoods.com/news-id-nanban-vijay-15-01-12651.htm


Kamalakannan1985 (talk) 12:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Sources aren't reliable. --Bryce (talk | contribs) 04:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 16 January 2012


Thanks for the above reply. I am hereby attaching a reliable source. Kindly consider the below : Nanban 4 days collection stands above 45 crores :

http://www.kollyinsider.com/2012/01/nanban-4-day-box-office-collections.html

http://www.cinemamasti.com/news/nanban-four-days-collections.html

Kamalakannan1985 (talk) 10:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Neither these are reliable sources. -- Karthik Nadar 12:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 16 January 2012

give the collecciotns of nanban so far 117.206.59.144 (talk) 09:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Source? -- Karthik Nadar 12:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 17 January 2012

pls post the collection of 57 crores in 5 days

117.206.58.123 (talk) 09:39, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. X.One SOS 13:33, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 17 January 2012

An article in india today says that nanban had grossed more than 50 crores...is that a reliable source for u.........jst check it...then post 117.206.58.123 (talk) 09:40, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done. Referring to this? Well, not in the infobox, but definitely worth in the Box office section, where its already noted using a Oneindia.in source. Thanks. X.One SOS 13:36, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 17 January 2012

nanban collections,,,,,,,releable source http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/vijay-nanban-collects-57-box-office-170112.html 117.206.58.123 (talk) 15:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please check.It is already updated with the same source you have providing now.WikiMan88 (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 19 January 2012

Please add the following : The movie, in its first weekend, has raked in £ 1,17,846 [approx. Rs. 92.77 lacs]. It was released in 24 screens and the per show average stands at £ 4,910. Whereas, other Tamil release Vettai on 15 screens has collected £ 17,605 [approx. Rs. 13.86 lacs].

There are two sources for this news. I can get you more if required. sources : http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/vijay-collection-international-box-office-190112.html

http://www.moviecrow.com/News/597/box-office-report---jan-16

Please add the following for chennai BO : Nanban has netted a record Rs 2.27 crores in four days at CBO, which is outstanding.

Source : http://www.sify.com/movies/boxoffice.php?id=14989093&cid=13525926

Kamalakannan1985 (talk) 11:16, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done: Info added with reference to sources from Oneindia.in and Sify.com. Moviecrow.com is not a reliable source. -- Karthik Nadar 06:57, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 19 January 2012

1st week box office collection is only 20 cores

sources :

http://zeenews.india.com/entertainment/regional/nanban-is-not-raking-the-moolah-bo-reports-false_104112.html

www.kollyinsider.com/.../nanban-4-day-box-office-collections.html


Nirosanda (talk) 05:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Kollyinsider.com is not an reliable source. Regarding Zee News, the source cant be trusted because even they are confused. Check here. -- Karthik Nadar 07:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


How can you say "www.kollyinsider.com/.../nanban-4-day-box-office-collections.html" is an unreliable source ??? Check behindwoods it's telling the Chennai BO, where sify is telling another. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirosanda (talk • contribs) 10:23, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 19 January 2012

pls give a new poster

117.206.52.164 (talk) 15:08, 19 January 2012 (UTC)  Not done: Why you want new poster everyday? Why don't you upload it and add it. -- Karthik Nadar 16:25, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 19 January 2012

please change the following : Nanban first week collection is less than 20 cores. please, change it

source : http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/vijay-nanban-box-office-report-180112.html

hello zee news were the first site to wrongly claim it collected 20 crores bcoz of them only all the other sites said the same report but now zeenews themselves have reported that they wrongly informed it and they again reported the exact collection is 61 crore for first week from reliable sources.

you are total wrong it's not zee news it is entertainment.oneindia.in. If, you have no idea please check the time.

hello then wat about this reference below the next day 19th from oneindia mentioning that the domestic gross(tamil nadu gross)is only 20c in first weekend and it is not the worldwide gross.so they themselves are confused we cant use them.

http://entertainment.oneindia.in/tamil/news/2012/vijay-collection-international-box-office-190112.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.18.210 (talk) 06:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply] 


Also, first week chennai box office collection is 1.37 cores, it has been confirmed by behindwoods. Behindwoods is the official BO report provider for Chennai, not Sify.

source : http://www.behindwoods.com/tamil-movies-slide-shows/movie-4/top-ten-movies-jan-16/tamil-cinema-topten-movie-nanban.html

Nirosanda (talk) 15:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

hello nirosanda c the behindwoods link its totally wrong the film was released on 12th but collection report of them is from 13th to 15th so its totally unfair to add that collection from behindwoods and they have also mentioned in that link that Pongal special shows are not considered while calculating box office collections. but sify also included the correct collection amount from the day of release(12th) so we have added it.


  • Pongal special shows are not considered while calculating box office collections. This how the box office works. you can't add pongal special shows collections to BO

any ways sify has calculated the exact amount from the day of release 12th and they have not neglected anything such as pongal special shows so we have added sify collection report.A proper site should report the collection from the day of release of the film.sorry we cant use that behindwoods reference — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.18.210 (talk) 06:27, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Pongal special shows rate are much higher that the normal rates, since that we won't add those collection to BO. this, is the tradition so far and it's ridiculous that you trying to change it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nirosanda (talk • contribs) 08:06, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

whatever the tradition maybe but a film's boxoffice collection report will be added in wikipedia only from the first day of its release not any other day after that as per wikipedia rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.107.163 (talk) 10:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 20 January 2012

pls change the poster 117.206.49.38 (talk) 06:42, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now:. Posters need not be changed unless a specific reason is given. But, I do agree this one has subjective claims and needs to be replaced. I'll see if something can be done. X.One SOS 12:37, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 20 January 2012

i think nanban collections are now increased,,61 c was 6 days collection....according to some sites,,7 days collection is 86c http://www.southmoviemasala.com/mnews/nanban-7-days-collections.html http://superwoods.com/photo-galleries/nanban-7-days-total-collection/01-nanban-7-days-total-collection-vijay.html http://timesofap.com/cinema/tag/nanban-seven-days-collections/ kindly add the collection reports 117.206.49.38 (talk) 06:48, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done for now: I appreciate all the efforts you took to get these sites, and the sources seem good, but unfortunately, going by their terms and conditions, they cannot be considered reliable on Wikipedia. If we get a consensus established to use these sites, until a reliable source lets out the gross, then we can consider it. I'll try searching for some. X.One SOS 12:44, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 20 January 2012

first week box office report is fake. the correct one is 20cores.

source : www.tamilkey.com/shankars-nanban-box-office-reports-turn-false.html

 Done 203.62.175.4 (talk) 08:12, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Tamilkey is not reliable. X.One SOS 12:41, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 20 January 2012

nanban 1week collection 85 c http://loudtwitter.com/nanban_1week/ 117.206.55.26 (talk) 15:26, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The source you mentioned is unlikely to be reliable. X.One SOS 07:36, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 21 January 2012

117.213.49.211 (talk) 05:04, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: No request made. X.One SOS 07:38, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 21 January 2012

.

117.206.59.231 (talk) 17:56, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

N Not done No request made. X.One SOS 06:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 22 January 2012


117.206.62.220 (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

N Not done No request made. X.One SOS 06:54, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 22 January 2012

Nanban 10 days collection reports are out..its 105.2 crores. http://superwoods.com/news-id-nanban-vijay-21-01-12-02728.htm http://www.southmoviemasala.com/mnews/nanban-10-days-collection.html http://apbin.com/link/148220 kindly post them

117.206.58.21 (talk) 18:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: The sources provided are not a reliable source. -- Karthik Nadar 09:42, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 23 January 2012

pls update the collections so far,,,it grossed more dan 100 cr says many websites.. 117.206.62.123 (talk) 13:24, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Provide a reliable source, i will update it! -- Karthik Nadar 14:00, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request on 24 January 2012


117.206.55.29 (talk) 07:09, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Nanban_(2012_film)&oldid=472939856"