These days, I am not very active on Wikipedia. Feel free to email me for a quick response.
\'pur-pəs\
My purpose on Wikipedia is to help create articles of the best possible quality, informative, interesting, and free of bias. Further, I will lend what analysis I can to community discussion and will try to improve Wikipedia's overall design, look, and feel. Fault me if you ever see me doing otherwise.
\'short\
I like to think of myself as a dynamic individual who constantly changes - hopefully for the better - without compromising my core values. I don't like the idea of becoming stagnant, outdated, or irrelevant, so Wikipedia is pretty much a perfect fit for me.
\sə-'jes-chənz\
Bots
Don't allow multiple "spell checker" bots, as this could be very inefficient. Instead, add to one bot's dictionary.
Policy
Don't allow sections called "Conclusion" in Wikipedia articles. Such subheadings are, by nature, both POV and original research.
Organization
Some of these are probably impossible:
Normalize everything under one domain. (For example, en.wikimedia.org, es.wikipedia.wikimedia.org, de.commons.wikimedia.org. . . .)
Continue to allow, say, wikipedia.com to redirect to the appropriate page.
Under the new domain system, change the user system so that user pages/edits/contributions are all one a single page, if the user desires. (For example: wikimedia.org/User:John.) This would involve some kind of normalization as well. 3NF is good.
Somehow categorize Wikipedia:How to . . . articles better, possibly all stemming from one category. Highlights could be shown on the Community Portal. (In short, unify Wikipedia.)
Don't blindly divide categories by letter, but rather by supercategory.
