Jump to content

Talk:Zalman King

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 202.142.129.66 (talk) at 00:17, 6 February 2012 (→‎Birth year and age at death). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography: Actors and Filmmakers Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconScreenwriters Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Screenwriters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of screenwriting, screenwriters, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Image

As King has passed on, the likelihood of finding free images becomes less. If someone wants to place a nonfree image here solely to illustrate this article, I think we can find one better than this one.(mercurywoodrose)76.234.123.65 (talk) 01:19, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Birth year and age at death

Lots of sources say he was born in May 1941 and was 70 when he died. Lots of sources say he was born in May 1942 and was 69 when he died. Either of those could be true.

But then there are those that say he was born in May 1942 and was 70 - which is mathematically impossible. Our very own beloved article is currently saying this.

We need to find something authoritative to settle the matter (with due respect, an anonymous editor claiming to be his son-in-law could be anyone at all). -- Jack of Oz [your turn] 23:47, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]