Talk:Critique of Dialectical Reason

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Critique of Dialectical Reason article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books Stub‑class

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Philosophy: Literature / Social and political / Continental / Contemporary Stub‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Social and political philosophy
	Continental philosophy
	Contemporary philosophy

Good a place as any

I have the work and have begun reading it and rereading Search. I haven't found any decent summary of the work anywhere, or even a bad one (this here being a stub sofar), so will try to fill this out here if I can find the time to do so. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 00:47, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The plan would be to follow the outline of the Sheridan-Smith translation, which is original to it as Sarte didn't supply such structure. After getting it, I will likely be dismissive of the second volume based on current information as well as the fact that SFAIK it addresses a historical condition (Stalinism) that is of little interest now. There's also the fact of Sartre's deterioration due to amphetamines and health issues, the sum of these making the first volume in essence the part of the work of any significant value. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 12:24, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, after placing the talkheader, I realized it would be better to develop the article in my own space. Lycurgus (talk) 13:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Put a little more into it, removed tag I placed. 72.228.177.92 (talk) 03:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think Kolakowski's comments should be less central.