Jump to content

User talk:Tnxman307

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has administrator privileges on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fortheloveofbacon (talk | contribs) at 02:16, 8 March 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This is Tnxman307's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Tnxman307.

  • If I left you a message:
please answer on your talk page.
  • If you leave me a message:
I will answer on my talk page.
  • Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
  • Sections on this talk page are archived automatically after 10 days without new replies.
    If this happens, please start a new section and include a diff to the last replied-to version in the relevant archive (see the list of archives below this box).
  • If you feel I have made a mistake, please feel free to leave me a note. I'll be happy to discuss it with you. Similarly, if you believe that one of my admin actions should be reverted, I will not consider it wheel-warring if you do so. However, do please leave me a note here informing me of it.
  • I am not here everyday. If you leave me a message and I don't respond immediately, don't panic! I will get back to you the next time I am online and see your message.
  • Finally, welcome! I enjoy editing here and hope you do too. Cheers!

Evanston, Illinois

I don't understand your deletion of the three newspapers under "local media". I have no relationship to any of the papers but as a long time and active resident of Evanston, I can assure you that from the standpoint of a typical citizen of Evanston, the only newspaper on the original list that may not be notable is the one you left there. Very few people in the community outside Northwestern University read the Daily Northwestern. Accordingly, I have reversed your deletion. If you wish to make a case for your deletion, please take it to the talk page of the article before you take any further action. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DS1953 (talk • contribs)

Council of Women World Leaders

Hello, it has been brought to my attention that the Council's page is no longer up to date. I am not adding promotional material, merely making it as current as possible so Wikipedia can continue to be most reliable. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecb1996 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be adding promotional material copied directly from a council brochure. Please note that Wikipedia does not permit advertising. TNXMan 20:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Mercy Killing?

I'm not sure what more concrete evidence is needed... so why is this case not marked for close? Like... yesterday? This case is so completely without merit that I am feeling Schadenfreude. America, Australia, Czech, Sweden... what the hell is this SPI about? Seriously, dude, smack this report with a cluebat before I do. If I have to further disprove a completely incorrect line of reasoning before this case is closed, SPI is in a serious state of cluelessness. Say it ain't so! Doc talk 04:57, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Freaking.. thanks! Doc talk 05:15, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SPI case

You appear to be using a CU finding about the Oliveriki account from several months ago and another from over a year ago. Some of these accounts have come out clean after one check and then later found to be connected through a separate sock and several socks have popped up since then. The account looks very much like a sock and I am quite annoyed that you would close down the report based on those stale findings alone, even though CU is understood to not be the smoking gun on whether an account is not a sock.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 17:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aside from the reasons I listed already, Oliveriki has made two (TWO) edits in the past three months and eight total edits since January 1 2011. In fact, I think they've had their name brought up at SPI more times than they have edits. Please don't bring this account up again at SPI unless something changes. TNXMan 19:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Number of edits is not a reason for ignoring the account. In fact, the last edit this account made (restoring a massive Xebulon edit) sparked off a great deal of disruptive edit-warring at the Nagorno-Karabakh article and the other notable edits were backing up Xebulon in an edit war. Obviously Oliveriki's few edits have been highly disruptive to a topic area under discretionary sanctions and these few edits tend to be connected with Xebulon. This is very much a quack situation and the disruption alone severe enough to merit action.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 21:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Devil, please be aware of WP:TROLL, WP:AGF and WP:BATTLEGROUND. Thanks. Winterbliss (talk) 05:10, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ping!

...in case you don't watch processed cases (I certainly don't). In summary, I couldn't get a positive hit on the proxy, and came to quite a different conclusion. I may have fudged the proxy check, so I'd be grateful if you could follow up at the investigation at your first convenience. Best, AGK [•] 14:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replied there. TNXMan 15:17, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New name

I've had an IP stalker now for 3 months who reverts most of my edits on sex-related articles. Is it okay if i create a new account exclusively for sex-related edits on pages which are not semi-protected? Pass a Method talk 20:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK by me, but I would email Arbcom with your new account name and a brief explanation of what's going on. Just make sure you read and understand WP:SOCK. TNXMan 20:39, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is emailing arbcom a must? If so, can you give me a link to the Arbcom email please? Pass a Method talk 21:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) It's not a must, but just in case you get called a sock later, it's better to have disclosed to ArbCom, or someone you trust. (Again my recommendation is ArbCom, but whichever is best for you) And the email is arbcom-l@lists.wikimedia.org as noted on WP:ARBCOM. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 21:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cleverbot

I apologise if my edit was seen as a website promo but could you please have notified me about my mistake and then changed it to reflect what i was stating after correcting the mistake e.g. deleting the website i mentioned only and not deleting the entire section? regards, Turbo566 talk 15:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at fortheloveofbacon's talk page. ℱorƬheℒoveofℬacon ✉ • ✍ 02:16, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tnxman307&oldid=480768823"